L. Hably szerk.: Studia Botanica Hungarica 22. 1990 (Budapest, 1990)
From the Lower Oligocène (Tard Clay Formation) VARGA (1956), ANDREÁNSZKY (1963), NOVAK (1950) could describe similar plants from the Budaújlak, Csillaghegy and Kiseged floras, as well as several boreholes (HABLY 1979b). The only print found at Vértesszőlős proves that it was present in very small quantities in the Egerian, playing a very subordinate role in the flora. This is in direct contrast with the Czech Egerian, where the L. salicor nioides is one of the dominating species, a marker of the horizon. We have no idea on the causes of withdrawal of L. salicornioides in the Hungarian Egerian. In the Ottnangian Stage (Lower Miocene ), again we meet the species in great quantities on the palaeofloristical localities. This is proved by the flora of Ipolytarnóc (JABLONSZKY 1914-15, HABLY 1985) from where several specimens were collected. It is widely distributed in the Egerian and the Miocene of Europe. There are specimens known even from the Sarmatian Stage and the Pliocene flora of Kodor as well (K0LAK0VSKI 1964). Cephalotaxaceae Cephalotaxus Siebold et Zuccharini Cephalotaxus harringtonia (Knight) Koch fossilis Pl. II, Figs. 2-3; Fig. 2. 1966 Cephalotaxus drupacea Sieb, et Zucc. fossilis Andr.; Andreánszky, p. 141, Pl. 1, Fig. 1. 1978 Cephalotaxus ex. gr . harringtonia (Knight) K. Koch fossilis; Mai & Walther, p. 31. Material: No.: 76.9.1.(3); 76.131.1.(2); 76.214.1. 6 pieces Description: The width of the sprout axis is surprisingly great, 0.3 cm. The size of,the leaves surpasses that of the other related forms ( Taxodium , Sequoia ). the width of the leaves is ranging between 0.20-0.22 cm, their length is 2.2-2.6 cm. The leaves are sword-form, arched, getting narrow by the end. Their angle of divergence is 37-40 to horizontal line. At some places, the scars left by the fallen leaves can be observed, while on the opposite side the apices of the rear-side leaves are visible from under the sprout axis. The genus is currently living in Eastern Asia. ANDREÁNSZKY (1966a) published similar remains from the Sarmatian flora of Bükkszentmárton. Lauraceae Daphnogene Unger cf. Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger Pl. IV, Fig. 2; Pl. VI, Figs. 1-2; Pl. VII, Figs. 1-2; Pl. VIII, Figs. 1-3; Pl. IX, Fig. 2; Figs. 4-5, 7, 9-13, 21, 27, 83. 1822 Phyllites cinnamomifolia Brong. in Cuvier; Brongniart 2 Bd. 1850 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia Unger; Unger, p. 168, PI. 39, Figs. 7-9. 1873 Cinnamomum rossmässleri Heer; Engelhardt, p. 26, Pl. 5, Fig. 4. 1950 Cinnamomophyllum polymorphum (A. Br.) Kräusel & Weyland; Kräusel & Weyland, p. 70, PI. 17, Figs. 2-3; Pl. 18, Fig. 1. 1974 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger; Kvacek & Walther, p. 199, Pl. 1, Figs. 1-2; Pl. 2, Figs. 1-5. 1974 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger; Kvacek & Walther, ibid 202, Pl. 1, Fig. 4; Pl. 3, Figs. 1-5. 1974 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger; Kvacek & Walther, ibid. 201, Pl. 1, Fig. 3; PI. 4, Figs. 1-3. 1978 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger; Mai & Walther, p. 43, PI. 2, Figs. 24-25; PI. 20, Figs. 5-9; Pl. 21, Figs. 1-2. 1988 Daphnogene cinnamomifolia (Brong. in Cuvier) Unger; Hably p. 39, PI. 5, Figs. 1-5; Pl. 6, Fig. 1. 9
