Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 98. (Budapest 2006)

Makranczy, Gy.: Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the genera in the Carpelimus group (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae)

4. Ochthephilus omalinus (ERICHSON, 1840) [22] 5. Ochthephilus monticola (CAMERON, 1924) [23] 6. Carpelimus similis (SMETANA, 1967) [24] 7. Carpelimus exiguus (ERICHSON, 1839) [25] 8. Carpelimus elongatulus (ERICHSON, 1839) [26] 9. Carpelimus bifidus sp. n. [27] 10. Xerophygus pallipes MOTSCHULSKY, 1857 [28] 11. Xerophygus hreblayi sp. n. [29] 12. Mimopaederus insularis (CAMERON, 1936) [30] 13. Thinodromus priorus GlLDENKOV sp. n., in litt. [31] 14. Thinodromus dilatatus (ERICHSON, 1839) [32] 15. Thinodromus corvinus (CASEY, 1889) [33] 16. Thinodromus caloderinus (LECONTE, 1877) [34] 17. Teropalpus juanfernandezianus sp. n. [35] 18. Teropalpus skottsbergii (BERNHAUER, 1921) [36] 19. Thinodromus luteipes (SOLIER, 1849) [37] 20. Thinodromus diffusus (CASEY, 1889) [38] 21. Thinodromus chagosanus (BERNHAUER, 1922) [39] 22. Thinodromus thoracicus GlLDENKOV, 2000 [40] 23. Thinodromus indiens (CAMERON, 1920) [41], formerly m Apocellagria 24. Thinodromus schillhammeri sp. n. [42] 25. Thinodromus singularis (FAUVEL, 1907) [43], formerly in Apocellagria 26. Trogactus ocellatus sp. n. [44] 27. Trogactus godmani SHARP, 1887 [45] About the selection of taxa - The selection of the most basal outgroup was a particularly difficult one. I picked both Platydeleaster and Deleaster, because they possess important features in different states. The inclusion of only one of them did not give a truthful representation of the primitive character states or would have hidden important facts. Both species of Eppelsheimius are included because the older literature associated these with a range of genera and some publications implied that they might differ in some features of key importance. The type species of all the genera synonymized herein (A. indica for Apocellagria and B. schweigeri for Bledioschema) are included in the analysis. For the outgroups, those taxa were chosen that share character states with the ingroups, therefore can resolve their relatedness. Particularly poorly sampled are the huge lineages of the Thinobius group, Bledius and the OxyteluslAnotylus lineages, however, the diversity in these lineages does not greatly influence the larger phylogeny addressed in this study. Taxon sampling in the ingroup differs from the outgroup in density and method: all