Szabó Miklós, Petres F. Éva: Decorated weapons on the La Tene Iron Age in the Carpathian Basin. (Inventaria Praehistorica Hungariae 5; Budapest, 1992)
Notes
231 Cp. Chapter I, p. 27. 232 M. SZABÓ in DUVAL-KRUTA (1979) 117 and 184, Fig. 2. (see also p. 28 above). 233 See the analysis in Chapter II, p. 28. For the Kosd finds, cp. HUNYADY (1957) 162 ff. DE NAVARRO (1972) 92-93, on the basis of innaccurate information. 234 <pk e workshop could have adopted the "Hungarian Style" ornament from elsewhere. Aside from this there axe no sound arguments for assuming that the engraver of Cernon-sur-Coole scabbard had worked in the same workshop (see also p. 45). 235 M. SZABÓ, in DUVAL-KRUTA (1979) 165-166, Figs. 11-12. Cp. KRUTA (1975) 386, note 1. 236 For the finds from the Marne, see V. KRUTA-P. ROUALET, in DUVAL-KRUTA (1982) 115 ff. 237 See also the remarks on the distribution of dragon-pair swords in Chapter II, p. 36. 238 As reflected by DE NAVARRO's study, and his analysis and typological-morphological comparison of "western" and "eastern" Celtic swords: DE NAVARRO (1972) 34 ff; cp. also SZABÓ (1974b), as well as PETRES-SZABÓ (1986) on Hatvan-Boldog type swords. 239 See the Introduction, p. 18. Cp. BRUNAUX-MENIEL-RAPIN (1980) 13 ff. 240 For terminological problems, cp. note 238. For the standard of publications, see the Introduction, p. 17. 241 DUVAL (198a2) 3 ff, and esp. 12-13, Fig. 6.1-6. 242 Ibid., Cp. M. SZABÓ in DUVAL-KRUTA (1982) 182-183, note 59. For the various tools used in executing different patterns, see DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) 1 ff. 243 See M. GUSTIN in DUVAL-KRUTA (1982) 191-192. See also the Introduction, p. 17-18. 244 DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) 1 ff, 4-5 and note 6 (with the earlier literature). 246 Ibid., 12 ff, for a more detailed analysis. 246 Nantes, Musée Dobré, 890.80.1. The bronze mount adorns the upper part of the lower third third of the iron scabbard. 247 MEGAW (1973) 126 Fig. 4.1 248 OSTERHAUS (1969) Fig. 2.6a. 249 DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) 22, Fig. 14-16. 250 HUNYADY (1942-44) 34. 251 DUVAL (1974) 105 ff. Cp. DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) 10. 252 ZACHAR (1974b) 61 ff. 253 MEGAW (1973) 119 ff, Fig. 2, and 24-26, PL 27. 3-4. 254 Ibid., and MEGAW (1970) 118, no. 183. 265 Cp. M. SZABÓ, in DUVAL-KRUTA (1982) 177, note 11. (DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) is the first part of the publication, for it does not contain a comparative art historical analysis.) 256 See notes 136 and 142. 257 DE NAVARRO (1972) 295 and 299. 258 MEGAW (1973) 127-131. Cp. KRUTA's arguments againts the criteria of a "Gaulish Sword Style": KRUTA (1975) 384-385, notes 3-4. 259 See Cat. no. 37 and M. SZABÓ in DUVAL-KRUTA (1982) 177, 184, Fig. 2. 260 For the ornament of the upper part of the front plate, cp. KRUTA (1973) 650 ff. 261 For its dating, see PETRES-SZABÓ (1986) 266-267; cp. also Chapter IV, p. 57-58. 262 Cp. DE NAVARRO (1972) 84-86, Fig. 24. For the Halimba site, see SZABÓ (1974b) 248 and 250. 263 Cp. MEGAW (1973) 128-129, Fig. 6. 264 STEAD (1984) 277, no. 69, without a definite standpoint on whether the dragon-pair is of Type I or III. 265 See note 263 for the comparison of the two scabbards. 266 Cp. the scabbards from Batina (Cat. no. 102) and Tapolca-Szentkút (Cat. no. 71); and also notes 226-229. 267 We had the opportunity to study the CannesEcluse chape in the storerooms of the Direction de la Protohistorie de la Région Parisienne (Paris, Trocadéro) in 1981. 268 Cp. DE NAVARRO (1972) 88; KKM, no. 86 (70). 269 R. DE MARINIS, in GÜSTIN (1977) 23 ff. 270 HORVÁTH (1979) 131-133, Pl. XIX. lb-c, and 163, Pl. II. 12. Cp. also PETRES-SZABÓ (1986) 266-269, Figs. 10-12. 271 JOVANOVIÓ (1984) 82, Fig. 9. 272 Cp. note 270; JOVANOVIÓ (1984) 83 ff; SZABÓ (1985) 60. 273 MEGAW (1973) 120-122, with a survey of earlier views. For Cernon-sur-Coole, see DUVAL-KRUTA (1986) 10: "vers le milieu du III e siècle av. J. O".
