Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. A Szent István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 30. 2000 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (2001)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Horváth Tünde – Kozák Miklós – Pető-Farkas Anna: The complex investigation of the stone artefacts from Vatya-earthworks of Fejér county. Part. I. p. 7–20. t. I–XII.

106: trapezoid chisel-axe, on the one face is hole-imitative, on the other face is just the blow-place of it. The working edge is blunt, the faces are concave-flat with microwear. The other end was formerly a chisel-edge too, but it is absolutely worn. It was an amulet or whetstone secondarily? S.: 58x3x10 mm, Raw mat.: piroxenite-amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 6859. 107: trapezoid small chisel-axe, very bad condition, worn raw material, on the surface there are faults, rising between using. The working edge is mildly curved, very blunt. S.: 65x29x20 mm, Raw mat.: amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 6861. 108: perforated chisel-axe, fragment, broken on the handle-hole, the faces are flat, with strong microwear. The lateral faces are medium sized. The working edge is very blunt. S.: 70x50x33, d=21, Raw mat.: metamorphite. Inv. No.: 6137. 109: perforated, chisel-axe, fragment, broken on the handle-hole. The faces are flat, the lateral faces are medium high. The working edge is blunt, it was not re-polished, thus it was used as hammer. S.: 68x47x38 mm, d=16 mm, Raw mat.: microdiorite. Inv. No.: 6138. 110: broken stone, the remained faces are nicely polished, it was whetstone or axe. Rectangular, easy body. S.: 72x23x13 mm, Raw mat.: ? Inv. No.: 6141. 111 : The working edge is regular, round, concave, pointed hammerend, long, bill-like, the corp is straight, broken on the handle-hole. S.: 78x37x29, d= 11-12 mm, Raw mat.: amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 6841. 112: bulky, round axe, the working edge is chisel, strongly blunt. The faces are smooth, the lateral faces are widening, damaged. The other end is round. The raw material is very rough, grained. S.: 106x44x48 mm, Raw mat.: amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 7263. 113: broken, trapezoid shape axe, the edge is blunt, it was former chisel? The faces are mildly concave, with microwear. S.: 49x56x17 mm, Raw mat.: metamorphite. Inv. No.: 6132. (Microphoto) 1

14: trapezoid axe with rounded corners, both ends are blunt, broken, with microwear. The faces are concave. It is an absolutely nicked, changed-edge chisel-axe, secondary used as whetstone or amulet. S.: 79x34x19 mm, Raw mat.: metaaleurolite. Inv. No.: 6133. 115: mace-head, fragment, broken on the handle-hole, round, in the centre widening, nicely polished, it was dignity-sign. S.: 72x50, d=1819 mm, Raw mat.: metamorphite. Inv. No.: 6135. 116: mace-head, fragment, nice polished, broken on the handle-hole. S.: 55x75 mm,d=13-20mm, Raw mat.: metamorphite. Inv. No.: 6136. 117: mace-head, fragment, with part of the handle-hole. S.: 78x58, d=21 mm, Raw mat.: serpentinite. Inv. No.: 6134. (Microphoto) 118: trapezoid shape chisel-axe, the fore-face is concave, the other end is broken, the back-face is flat, the working edge is shaip. Microwear on the body, middle-sized. S.: 61x41x16mm, Raw mat.: metasediment. Inv. No.: 6837. 119: broken pebble, it was a chisel-edged axe? S.: 130x45x40 mm, Raw mat.: quartzite. Inv. No.: 6836. 120: large, half fragment of an axe, the working edge is blunt, faults, the fore-face is concave, the back face is flatter, damaged. S.: 122x65x26 mm, Raw mat.: metamorphite. Inv. No.: 6831. 121: elongated, narrow shoe-last celt, the working edge is chisel, nicked, the fore-face is concave, narrow, the back face is flat, the lateral faces are high, damaged. Microwear on the back face. S.: 113x32x25 mm, Raw mat.: ? Inv. No.: 6033. 122: perforated, broken on the handle-hole, chisel-axe, the faces are flat, narrow, the lateral faces are high, the one is strongly damaged, the working edge is blunt. S.: 88x47x43 mm, Raw mat.: metaaleulorite. Inv. No.: 6839. 123: perforated axe, broken on the handle-hole, the faces are flat, with microwear, the lateral faces are high, damaged, the working edge was former into chisel-edge, but absolutely worn, secondarily used as hammer. S.: 85x48x45 mm, Raw mat.: amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 6840. (Microphoto) 124: saw on crescent flake, sickle-shine, bifacial retouch, S.: 21x20x4 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv. No.: 6150. 125: blade-like flake, not worked. S.: 27x19x5 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv. No.: 6150. 126: atypical gimlet on flake. S.: 25x16x8 mm, Raw mat.: Firestone. Inv. No.: 6149. 127: middle fragment of a blade, on the fore face are 2 spines. S.: 39x32x9 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv. No.: 6150. 128: flake, the bulbe is large, the talon is broken. S.: 29x27x9 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv.: No.: 6150. 129: not worked stone-piece. S.: 45x22x5 mm, Raw mat.: limnoquartzite. Inv. No.: 6150. 130: saw on crescent flake, bifacial retouch. S.: 27x17x3 mm, Raw mat.: Buda hornstone. Inv. No.: 6148. 131: flake. S.: 33x32x12 mm, Raw mat.: hornstone. Inv. No.: 6150 132: conical flake. S.: 26x30x22 mm, Raw mat.: hornstone. Inv. No.: 6850. 133: flake, S.: 29x18x4 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv. No.: 6850. 134: crescent flake, atypical gimlet. S24xl4x6 mm, Raw mat.: Buda hornstone. Inv. No.: 6850. 135: saw on crescent flake, bifacial retouch, sickle-shining, the talon is smooth, the bulbe is large, S.: 24x26x6 mm, Raw mat.: hornstone. Inv. No.: 6848. 136: atypical gimlet on crescent flake. S.: 22x23x3 mm, Raw mat.: jaspilite. Inv. No.: 6850. 137: blade-like, not worked stone piece. S.: 52x25x6 mm, Raw mat.: hornstone. Inv. No.: 6850. 138: saw on crescent flake, bifacial retouch, sickle-shining, S.: 32x23x6 mm, Raw mat.: Buda hornstone. Inv. No.: 6849. Appreciation: There were originally transported to the museum 11 grinding and polishing stones and a stone-mortar. Now we could investigate 4 pieces: 1 grinding stone (it was worn, rough grain), two small-sized polishing stones, fine-grained for sharpening, and a crescent fragment from a grinding stone, which was used secondarily as scraper. There were 10 handstones (8 broken), 2 showed ditch of sharpening, 7 polishing pebbles, and a retoucher. The stone material was fine conglomerate, quartzite and metamorphitic rocks or same case siliceous limestone (radiolarite) and Marble? Marl?.. The chipped stones were originally 20, and there was an arrow-head among them (now is missing). Now we count 15 pieces, 5 saw, 3 atypical gimlet, and a blade. The tools are worked on flake. The raw material were Buda hornstone (4), radiolarite (4), limnoquartzite (1). The axes are perforated (5) and not perforated (11). Among the not perforated axes we find a hatchet (secondarily worked), 10 trapezoid-shape axes with chisel-edge. Among the perforated axes there are 4 chiseledge, 2 hammer-edge tools. The secondary transformation can be seen on the axes many cases: - On the hatchet imitating metal-form. The other end is secondarily transformed, what was it formerly? - There are 2 stones (one was a polishing pebble the other was a trapezoid shape, chisel-axe) secondarily which were tried to be perforated, but not finished. They are whetstones or amulets? - One perforated, chisel-edge's axe was worn, too, than used as hammer There is a former chisel-axe, on both ends, trapezoid shape. It was secondarily transformed into whetstone or amulet (hole-imitative). The raw material was different type of metamorphite, andésite, ultrabasite and quartzite. 15