Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. A Szent István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 30. 2000 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (2001)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Horváth Tünde – Kozák Miklós – Pető-Farkas Anna: The complex investigation of the stone artefacts from Vatya-earthworks of Fejér county. Part. I. p. 7–20. t. I–XII.

surface: 130x22 mm, Raw mat.: fine conglomerate with siliceous cementation. Inv. No.: 63.50.22. 44: flat, unbroken grinding stone, small sized, the lateral faces are indented, damaged. The tool is fine-worked. The grinding surface is ellipse, mildly trough, the edges are smooth. Rough, pebbly stone, strongly cavernous. Size: grind, surface: 170x130 mm, Raw. mat.: fine conglomerate with siliceous cementation. Inv. No.: 63.50.22, 45: high, hemispherical, unbroken grinding stone with little lateral damage, rough, pebbly grain. The grinding surface is ellipse, the edges are smooth, in the centre are 3 stripes, mildly trough. Size: grind, surface: 200x165 mm, Raw mat.: fine conglomerate with siliceous cementation. Inv. No.: 63.55.22. 46: handstone, angular flat disc. On the concave face are two shining, on the flat face a sinking polishing surface. Size: 75x75x5, Raw mat.: trachyandesite. Inv. No.: 63.49.13. (Microphoto) 47: broken stone fragment, with polished surfaces, fragment of the handstone? Size: 55x40, Raw mat.: Quartzite. Inv. No.: 63.50.17. 48: flat, round smoothing pebble, the one face is black, burned. Raw mat.: Metaconglomerate. Inv. No.: 63.88.15. 49: flat smooth pebble, on the both side we can see beginning drillholes, which is not done. Amulet, not ready? Size: 60x15 mm, Raw mat.: Aleurolite. Inv. No.: 63.61.9. 50: bulky, middle-sized chisel-axe, the working edge is strongly worn, blunt, nicked. The fore-face is concave, the back face is flat, the upper edge is damaged, broken, the other end is shows blow-traces. On the body there are microwear traces. Size: 70x40x20 mm, Raw mat.: Amphibolitic andésite. Inv. No.: 63.63.3. 51: broken across and along too, mica-stone fragment, the unbroken face is polished, it was tool, maybe axe? Size: 60x40x23, Raw mat.: Metamorphite. Inv. No.: 63.63.4. (Microphoto) 52: perforated axe, broken on the handle-hole, and across too. The unbroken face is scratched, damaged. The working edge was chisel edge former, but now it is pointed, blunt hammer-edge, with secondary transforming. In the handle hole there are the grooves of the drill. Size: 30x35 mm, Raw mat.: Metasediment. Inv. No.: 63.60.4. 53: fragment of a rough, bulky hammer. The faces are flat, strongly damaged, with deep microwear-stripes. The working edge is pointed, blunt, thick. Size: 85x45x40 mm, Raw mat.: Metamorphite. Inv. No.: 63.65.10. 54: the backface is flat, the fore face is concave, both ends are round, with blow-traces. Rough, porous stone. Retoucher or pestle? Size: Raw mat.: Micaceous medium-grained sandstone. Inv. No.: 63.52.10. 55: quadrangular, flat stone fragment. On the unbroken end there are wear and blow-traces. Retoucher or pestle? Size: 45x55x30, Raw mat.: metasandstone. Inv. No.: 63.64.3. 56: casting mould, double, with the forms of axe and needles? On the one face: chisel-edge axe, black, burned, the other side: two, parallel rectangles hardly sunk in the surface, in the one two, in the other thin, needle-like dips. Size: 153x90x45, Raw mat.: micaceous middle-grained sandstone. Inv. No.: 63.80.5. Appreciation: Grinding stones: There were 15 lower grinding stones, 6 unbroken and 9 fragments. The shapes were several: hemispherical were 12, flat, rectangle or angular 4. The size of grain: 3 medium-grain, 9 rough, 3 fine. The size of the tools: 3 large, 4 small size. Microwear: wear grinding surface: in 11 cases, concreted 1, trough 7, traces of colouring matter 1, separated surface in 2 cases: for sharpening, blowing and grinding, wear in stripes for the grinding 6, mechanical traces 4, dip in the centre 2, the edges are indented: 1. The upper part of the grinding stone is the handstone: 1, but it was used for sharpening too, an other piece is broken, and 2 retoucher-pestle. The tools of grinding are quite numerous, and they were very worn pieces, with damages. The average raw material was fine conglomerate with siliceous and limonitic cementation. Axes: 2 were not perforated, one is with chisel-edge, very worn, the other is bulky hammer. There was one perforated axe, which was originally chisel edge-axe, but secondarily transformed to hammer, now absolutely broken. These implements were made of andésite (pyroxenite/amphibole) and metamorphite. Among the stone artefacts there was an amulet (the hole is not ready), smoothing pebbles used for the polishing the ceramics, and a casting mould. The last is very important, with two casting faces: one was axe, and the other is very strange, maybe for needles? These finds shows the metal-working and the pottery-working in the settlement. The grinding stones pointed at the importance of the cereal-processing. The parallel finds of the chisel-axe (casting mould): we know a similar casting mould of a simple chisel-axe, fragment, the site is unknown (in: Le bel Age du Bronze in Hongrie 1994, catalogue no: 341.), and another unbroken piece from Pécska (in: Dömötör 1902, 273/, 12-3.). Similar moulded bronze-finds are in the hoard of Dunakömlőd (in: A bronzkor kincsei Magyarországon 1995, 62/2.), Jászdózsa-Kápolnahalom (Le bel âge du bronze en Hongrie 1994, catalogue No: 368.) On the base of the stone artefacts Kajászó was a very important settlement, and we presume well-developed clay-processing industry on the base of the geomorphological situation of the settlement (Tordos, clay-formation near Kajászó). Pictures: Plate VI.: The map of the earthwork, after Nováki 1952, 9. The detail of the earthwork in 2000 63.65.10. trapezoid shape axe with chisel edge, drawing 63.63.3. bulky hammer, fragment, drawing 63.63.3. photo, hammer, secondary used for sharpening Plate VII.: Pestle, 63.52.10., photo 63.55.2. grinding stone with red paint on the bottom 60.80.5. casting mould, from both side 63.61.21. grinding stone, surface 63.75.1. grinding stone, flat, with pushing-stripes 63.52.13. grinding stone with cementation Plate VIII:. Microphotos of stone implements from the earthwork Lovasberény-Mihályvár Geographical description: There is a long and wide vineyard to the east from Lovasberény between the Vértes and Velence Mts. During the Pleistocene there was an eolian (loess) and fluvial accumulation and tectonical movement which determined the present surface (Róna-Szentes 1972). The whole area is clean loess, and many ravines separate it into several parts. Mihályvár is a similar part too, enclosed with ravines, which surmounts on the 11