Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 20. 1980 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1983)
Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Éry Kinga, K.: Comparative statistical studies on the physical anthropology of the Carpathian basin population between the 6–12th centuries A. D. p. 89–141.
hám (No. 103), Cegléd (No. 106), Dolny Jatov (No. 109), Felgyő (No. 110), Kardoskút (No. 112), and Orosháza (No. 114). Fig. 19: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Nővé Zámky History: the accurate identification of the locality this population came from is impossible, because of the circumstances already mentioned in relation with subcluster 1/a. The Nővé Zámky population may have been equally formed in the Northern Pontic region or in the area west of that territory. This latter definition includes the Carpathian Basin as well. Some secondary similarities with two contemporary Avar Period series from the region between the Danube and Tisza rivers seem to exist. There are numerous signs of this population's survival. Unfortunately, all of them are related to subcluster 1/a and as such are not useful in solving this problem. Geographical proximity however, supports the assumption that this series survived within the same geographical unit as part of populations which occupied the Northwestern region of the Carpathian Basin. Pôkaszepetk (No. 85; subcluster 1/b). This population is entirely Europoid with no analogies. History : as far as suggested by the position of the Pôkaszepetk population within subcluster 1/b, it may have been formed in the East European parkland area or in the neighboring decidious forest steppe belt. No contemporary series from the Carpathian Basin are similar and survival data are missing. Sükösd-Ságod (No. 86; cluster 3, Figure 20). The greater part of this population shows purely Europoid features. Euromongoloid elements make up some 5 percent of the sample. Analogies: Szeged-Kundomb (No. 88) and Üllő I. (No. 94) from the Avar Period. I 88 I 94 Fig. 20: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Sükösd History: as far as suggested by its position within cluster 3, the Sükösd population may have been formed somewhere in the eastern steppe belt. Within its period in the Carpathian Basin only the population of the region between the Danube and Tisza rivers is similar to that of the Sükösd sample. No survival data are available. Szeged-Fehértó „A" (No. 87; cluster Ъ, Figure 21). The majority of this population is entirely Europoid. Euro-mongoloids make up 2 percent of this material. Analogy: Avar Period Nővé Zámky (No. 84). Fig. 21: Dendrogram showing the analogy of Szeged —Fehértó History: the formation of the Szeged-Fehértó population probably took place somewhere in the eastern steppe belt as suggested by the sample's position in cluster 3. Secondary similarities occur between this sample and the one from Nővé Zámky. No indications of survival are available. Szeged-Kundomb (No. 88; cluster 3, Figure 22). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogies: the 3—5th century A. D. sample from the Upper Kama region (Mitinsk and Demenki) (No. 35), the Avar Period Kecel (No. 81), and Sükösd (No. 86). Fig. 22: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Szeged —Kundomb History: the population from Szeged-Kundomb was probably formed somewhere in the eastern steppe belt as one may see within cluster 3. It is impossible however, to locate its exact origin, even using the analogy from the Upper Kama region. On the one hand, it is possible that this population moved to the north from the "Sarmatian" environment of the Southern Volga region (See Backo Petrovo S el о sample and Figure 15). On the other hand, the Upper Kama sample is only one of the secondary analogies. Similarities within the Carpathian Basin occur only in the case of series from the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers. No survival data are available. Szeged-Makkoserdő (No. 89; subcluster 2/a, Figure 23). The greater part of this population is entirely Europoid. Mongoloid and Euro-mongoloids make up 10 percent of the sample. Analogies: 1st century A. D. Tuz Gyr by the Lake Aral (No. 21), 4—9th century A. D. Skalistoe in the Northern Pontic region (No. 57), 11—12th A. D. Kairy in the Northern Pontic region (No. 56), and group В from the Period of the Hungarian Conquest (No. 100). Fig. 23: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Szeged —Makkoserdő History: the population from SzegedMakkoserdő was probably formed somewhere in the eastern steppe belt. Unfortunately none of the analogies are of any help in determining the exact location (Figures 24, 25 and 26). This series is not similar to any of the contemporary populations known from the Carpathian Basin. In terms of survival some secondary similarities may be observed with group В from the Period of the Hungarian conquest at least as far as this latter is concerned. This resemblance however, may be only formal indicative of the fact that both populations belong to the same large morphometric group. 7 . 99
