Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 20. 1980 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1983)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Éry Kinga, K.: Comparative statistical studies on the physical anthropology of the Carpathian basin population between the 6–12th centuries A. D. p. 89–141.

Fig. 24: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Tuz Gyr Tiszaderzs-Szentimrei út (No. 92; subcluster 1/b, Figure 29). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogies: 3rd century В. С — 3rd century A. D. Late Scythian Period Neapol (No. 30) from the Northern Pontic region, the 2—4th century A. D. sample of the Chernakhovian culture from the Middle Dnepr region (No. 32), Ábrahám (No. 103), Cegléd (No. 106), Jászdózsa (No. Ill) and Zalavár (No. 120) from the Árpád Period. Fig. 25: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Kairy Fig. 26: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Skalistoe Szekszárd-Palánk (No. 90; subcluster 1/a, Figure 27). Entirely Europoid individuals make up the majority of this population, although Euro-mongoloids are also present in the sample (6%). Analogy: Kérpuszta (No. 113) from the Period of the Árpád Dynasty. Fig. 27: Dendrogram showing the analogy of Szekszárd— Palánk History: the Szekszárd population may originate from any part of the distribution area defined by subcluster 1/a. It is not similar to the contemporary series from the Carpathian Basin. The Kérpuszta analogy seems to explain some of this population's origin. Both series are located on the edge of subcluster 1/a and are somehow isolated from the rest of the sample. Szentes-Kaján (No. 91 ; subcluster 2/a, Figure 28). The majority of this population may be classified as Europoid, while Euro-mongoloids make up 2 percent of the sample. Analogy : 11—12th century A. D. Kairy (No. 56) from the Northern Pontic region. Fig. 28: Dendrogram showing the analogy of Szentes—Kaján History: as far as is suggested by the evidence of subcluster 2/a this population may have been formed somewhere in the eastern steppe belt. The more accurate identification of that location however, is not possible, even if one is aware of the existence of a later eastern analogy {See Figure 25). It is not similar to any of the contemporary series from the Carpathian Basin. No survival data are available concerning this population. Fig. 31: Dendrogram showing the analogies of the "Chernakhovian" sample from the Middle Dnepr river region Toponár-Őrház (No. 93; subcluster 2/a, Figure 32). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogies : the 3—4th century A. D. Moldavian series from the Chernakhovian culture (No. 33) 9th century A. D. Mikulcice (No. 73), Virt from the Avar Period (No. 96), Ábrahám (No. 103), Rusovce (No. 116) and Székesfehérvár-Szárazrét (No. 119) from the Árpád Period. Primary analogies indicate that the Toponár population should belong to subcluster 1/b. Secondary similarity with SzékesfehérvárSzárazrét however, groups the Toponár population into subcluster 2/a. Fig. 32: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Toponár 100 Fig. 29: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Tiszaderzs History: the Tiszaderzs population was probably formed either somewhere in the Northern Pontic or in the Middle Dnepr region. This is shown by the evidence of the analogy with Neapol (Figure 30) and the Chernakhovian culture (Figure 31). This sample is not similar to other contemporary series from the Carpathian Basin. Continuity is indicated only by the mutual primary analogies in relation with the Jászdózsa population. Fig. 30: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Neapol