Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 20. 1980 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1983)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Éry Kinga, K.: Comparative statistical studies on the physical anthropology of the Carpathian basin population between the 6–12th centuries A. D. p. 89–141.

Fig. 13: Dendrogram showing the analogies of "Sauromatians' Fig. 14: Dendrogram showing the analogies of "Sarmatians' from Western Kazakhstan Fig. 15: Dendrogram showing the analogies of the sample from the Upper Kama river region Homokmégy-Halom (No. 80; subcluster 2/a, Figure 16). The majority of this population is purely Europoid. The proportion of Euro-mongoloids is some 6 percent. Analogies: a "Sarmatian" series from 4th century В. C. — 4th century A. D. Ukranie (No. 27), the Avar Period Kecel (No. 81), Nővé Zámky (No. 84), and Üllő I. (No. 94), group A from the Period of the Hungarian Conquest (No. 99), the Árpád Period Felgyő (No. 110) and Székesfehérvár-Bikasziget (No. 118). Fig. 16: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Homokmégy History: the Homokmégy population had its origin somewhere in the steppe region east of the Dnepr river. More accurate localization of this series is not possible because of the secondary similarities with the "Sarmatian" sample from Ukraine. Primary similarities with this series may only be observed in the case of contemporary populations from the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers. In other words these similarities do not extend beyond the temporal and geographical boundaries of Homokmégy. Secondary analogies also blurr the information concerning the survival of this population. Considering however, that many of these secondary analogies come from the same area and from the eastern section of neighboring Transdanubia, one may not exclude some kind of a relationship between craniological materials from the two periods. Unfortunately, data available to date are not sufficient for the clarification of this question. Kecel 1. (No. 81; cluster 3, Figure 17). The majority of this population shows Europoid characteristics. The proportion of Mongoloids and Euro-mongoloids is approximately 21 (?) percent. Analogies: Avar Period Adorján (No. 76), Homokmégy (No. 80), Szeged-Kundomb (No. 88), Üllő I. (No. 94), and Üllő II. (No. 95). Fig. 17: Dendrogram showing the analogies of Kecel History: as suggested by the dendrogram, the Kecel series which belongs to the 3rd cluster, was probably formed somewhere in the eastern steppe belt. It does not bear similarities with the contemporaneous populations of the Carpathian Basin with the exception of contemporary samples from the geographical area between the Danube and Tisza rivers. No survival data are available on this population. Kékesd (No. 82; subcluster 2/a, Figure 18). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogy: Székesfehérvár-Szárazrét from the Period of the Árpád Dynasty (No. 119). Fig. 18: Dendrogram showing the analogy of Kékesd History: the Kékesd population belongs to subcluster 2/a which locates its origins in the steppe belt east of the Dnepr river. It is not similar to any of the contemporary series from the Carpathian Basin. As far as its survival is concerned, one of the samples from the Period of the Árpád Dynasty may be of interest: that comes from the most relevant geographical region, Eastern Transdanubia. Madaras-Téglavető (No. 83; cluster 4). The greater part of this population is Mongoloid and Euro-mongoloid. Purely Europoid individuals make up some 44 percent of the sample. No analogies are known. History: although the exact location of origin is not known, the respectable Mongoloid component suggests that the Madaras population was formed in Central Asia. This series is different from the other studied series which come from the Carpathian Basin. It is important to note however, that populations from the Avar Period are similarly dominated by Mongoloid elements. These Avar Period populations are known not only from the geographical region of the Madaras series (i.e. the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers) but also from the territory east of the Tisza river and from Western Transdanubia. No survival data are available. Nővé Zámky (Érsekújvár) (No. 84; subcluster 1/a, Figure 19). This population is entirely Europoid. Analogies : the "Scythian" sample from the 5—3rd century В. C. Northern Pontic region (No. 7), Nikolaevka—Kazatskoe (No. 28), Zolotaya Balka (No. 29), Neapol (No. 30) and Zavetnoe (No. 31) from the 3rd century В. C. •— 3rd century A. D. Late Scythian Period representing the same region, 10—11th century A. D. Sarkel II. by the Don (No. 54), the 9th century A. D. "western Slavic" Mikulcice (No. 73), the Avar Period Homokmégy (No. 80) and SzegedFehértó (No. 87), from the Period of the Árpád Dynasty Ábra98