A Herman Ottó Múzeum Évkönyve 43. (2004)

Kővári Ivett-Szathmáry László: Garadna-elkerülő út 2. lelőhely középső neolit csontvázleletei

Johnston F. E. 1961 Sequence of Epiphyseal Union in a Prehistoric Kentucky Population from Indian Knoll. Hum. Biol., 33:66-81. Kalicz Nándor-Makkay János 1977 Die Linienbandkeramik in der Grossen Ungarischen Tiefebene. Studia Archaeologica 7, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. Körber E. 1957 Abrasion und Artikulationsbewegung. DZZ, 12:117-129. Martin, Rudolf 1928 Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. I—II. Band, 2. Aufl., Fischer, Jena. Nemeskéri János-Harsányi László-Acsádi György 1960 Methoden zur Diagnose des Lebensalters von Skelettfunden. Anthrop. Anz., 24:70-95. Schour I.-Massler M. 1941 The Development of the Human Dentition. J. Am. Dent. Ass., 28:1153-1160. Sj0vold Torstein 1975 Tables of the Combinated Method for Determination of Age at Death Given by Nemeskéri, Harsányi and Acsádi. Anthrop. Közi., 19:9-22. 1990 Estimation of stature from long bones utilizing the line of organic correlation. Human Evol., 5:431-446. Szathmáry László 1982 Quantitaive Untersuchungen an den Skelettfunden der Linienbandkeramikkultur der Ostregion des Karpatenbeckens (Autochtonität der Skelettfunde der Alföld Linienbandkeramik - AVK). DMÉ (Debrecen), 23-51. 1983 Immigrant and autochthonous components during the transition period between the Mesolithic and the Early Neolithic in the Carpathian Basin and the Balkan. Anthropos (Athens), 10:329-340. 1991 Boreal-Atlantic Change in the Carpathian Basin Populations. Papers of the Scientific Session in Szeged (Hungary). Szeged-Ulm, 293-301. 2003 A Neolithic Skeleton from Mezőcsát-Csemetekert (NE Hungary). JAMÉ, XLV:235-243. Zoffmann Zsuzsanna 1993 Kelet-Kárpát-medence neolitikus és rézkori népességeinek embertani vázlata. Kandidátusi értekezés, Budapest (kézirat). MIDDLE NEOLITHIC SKELETON REMAINS FROM GARADNA-ELKERÜLŐ ÚT LOCALITY 2 The authors examined 12 Middle Neolithic skeleton remains dug up at the second locality of the excavations carried out during the construction of a new bypass around the village of Garadna. Most of the findings belonged to Bükk Culture. It is highly probable that the skeletons which couldn't be classified into this culture for lack of characteristic grave goods, in spite of being Neolithic ones, also represent this age and this culture. There was only one skeletal find appropriate for craniological comparison: the female skeleton from grave 83. According to the taxonomy elaborated by Guba, Szathmáry and Almási (1997), this individual fell within group F. It is not surprising at all as 6 of the 7 female cranial finds of similar age analysed and published so far can be classified with this group. Moreover, 9 out of the 12 individuals from Early Neolithic Körös-Starcevo Culture are of similar character as 352