Külpolitika - A Magyar Külügyi Intézet folyóirata - 2001 (7. évfolyam)
2001 / 1-2. szám - KÜLPOLITIKA-TÖRTÉNET - Romsics Gergely: Magyarország a "Foreign Affairs"-ben, 1940-1948
Magyarország a „Foreign Affairs"-ben, 1940-1948 24 „the fundamental facts - historical, geographical, ethnic and economic - will remain, and it is to an examination of these that this article is addressed." Mosely: i. m. 237. o. 25 „Hungary proper"; „Though the Rumanians cannot point to a long record of political domination over Transylvania, it is no less dear to them as the original home of modem Rumanian enlightenment and of some of the most authentically Rumanian peasant communities..." Uo. 238. o. 26 Uo. 238-241.; vő. Temperley: „How the Hungarian Frontiers Were Drawn". 441. o. 27 „[Transylvania] came through the postwar transition process in fairly good shape. Its... industries, freed froam Hungarian competition, found inernal markets in Greater Rumania." Mosely: i. m. 240. o. 28 Temperley, Harold W. V.: „The Making of the Treaties with Austria, Bulgaria and Hungary, and the Principles Underlying Them"; in: Temperley: A History of the Peace Conference of Paris. IV. köt., 416.; 420. o. 29 Uo. 241. o.; vö. Temperley: „How the Hungarian Borders Were Drawn". 446. o. 30 Mosely: i. m. 241. o. 31 „territorial cessions and plans for autonomy."; „Rumania was compelled by the Axis Powers to turn over 1,154,000 Rumanians to Hungarian rule in order that Hungary might recover the 367,864 Magyars of the three Szekely districts (1910 census) and connect them with the Magyar plain far to the West."; és „The Magyars preferred half of Transylvania firmly annexed to Hungary rather than an autonomous Transylvania with the Magyars in a conspicuous and hopeless minority." Uo. 242-244. o. 32 Uo. 237. és 243-244. o. 33 Katona: i. m. különösen 608-610. o. 34 Czettler, Anton: Pál Graf Teleki ind die Aussenpolitik Ungarns 1939-1941. München, Vg. Ungerisches Institut, 1996. 128-130. o. 35 Romsics: „A State Department..." 241-253. o. 36 Benes, Eduard: „The Organization of Postwar Europe"; Foreign Affairs 20. (1941-1942). 226- 242. o.; Otto of Austria [Habsburg Ottó]: „Danubian Reconstruction"; Foreign Affairs 20. (1941- 1942). 243-252. o. 37 Csonka Emil: Habsburg Ottó - Egy különös sors története. München, 1972. 345. o. 38 „Unless after this war conditions are cestablished which will render Germany unable to make war on a world scale fo a third time..." Benes: „Postwar Europe". 226. o. 39 „to prevent future third World War from ever taking place... a fundamental question is... how to safeguard Central Europe"; „accomplished fact"; Benes a konföderációk létrehozása mellett Németország decentralizációját is kívánatosnak tartja. Lío. 227-231. o. 40 Ugyanakkor ismételten kijelenti, hogy valószínűtlennek tartja, hogy bármelyik nép visszakívánná a Habsburgokat. Uo. 232-233. o. 41 „ethnic Germans"; „Fifth Column" Uo. 235-236. o. 42 „the totalitarian and dictator states" Uo. 237. o. 43 „The protection of minorities in the future should consist primarily in the defense of human democratic rights and not of national rights. Minorities in individual states must never again be given the character of internationally recgnized political and legal units, with the possibility of again becoming soources of disturbance." Uo. 238-239. o. 44 „The creation of larger federal blocs will also facilitate the solution of postwar economic problems. Uo. 239. o.; Armstrong: „Danubia Relief or Ruin". 602-604. és 614-616. o.; Katona: i. m. 608-609. o. 45 „an end must be put to the international hypocrisy which, when it is so disposed, finds reasons everywhere for intervening in the interior affairs of other states."; „So the united Europe of the future must find a way to stop the development of absolutism in individual countries in time, before it becomes a public danger." Benes: „Postwar Europe." 241. o. 2001. tavasz-nyár 249
