Szabó János szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 23. 2005. (Budapest, 2005)
Collimys dobosi n. sp Tabic 1 — Individual measurements and morphological data of Collimys dobosi n. sp. M 1 molars from Felsőtárkány 3/2. NQ inv. MMP Length Width Morphology mm mm Figure 8 2003. 1. 2.13 1.34 AaOv 2003. 2. 2.10 1.32 Aplw 2003. 3, figure 10: 4 2.09 1.33 BaOv 2003. 4, figure 9: 1 1.90 1.29 AaOv 2003. 5. 1.93 1.18 Aplw 2003. 6. 2.00 1.25 Aplv 2003. 7. 1.96 1.23 AaOv 2003. 8. 2.02 1.23 ApOv 2003. 9. 2.00 1.26 ApOv 2003. 10. 1.26 AaOv 2003. 11. ApOv 2003. 12. 2.02 1.26 AaOv 2003. 13, figure 9: 3 2.02 1.33 A.ilv 2003. 14. 1.90 1.20 AaOv 2003.15, figure 9: 2 2.04 1.27 AaOw 2003. 16. 2.04 1.29 ApOv 2003. 17, figure 10: 3 1.88 1.32 Axlw 2003. 18, figure 10: 6 2.13 1.32 I3p0w 2003. 19. 2.05 1.29 Ax 1 w 2003. 20, figure 9: 6 2.00 1.34 Aplv 2003. 21. 2.00 1.15 2003. 22. 1.99 1.33 AaOv 2003. 23. 2.01 1.30 Aplv 2003. 24. 2.00 1.32 2003. 25. 1.90 1.16 Axlv 2003. 26. 2.07 1.41 Axlv 2003. 27. 1.99 1.27 BpOv 2003. 28. 1.95 1.27 ApOv 2003. 29. 1.30 AxOv 2003. 30. 2.03 1.19 Ap 1 w 2003. 31 1.89 1.18 ApOv 2003. 32 2.10 1.30 ApOv 2003. 33. 2.17 1.34 AxOv 2003. 34. 2.03 1.32 ApOw 2003. 35, figure 10: 5 1.89 1.33 BpOv 2003. 36, figure 9: 4 2.02 1.30 ApOv 2003. 37, figure 9: 8 2.00 1.33 Aplw 2003. 38, figure 9: 5 2.1 1.29 ApOw 2003. 39. 2.07 1.34 Api Kv 2003. 40. 2.13 1.33 Axlw 2003. 41. 2.02 1.22 Aplv 2003. 42. 2.10 1.34 ApOv M 2 molars (Figures 3, 10, 12, 13) — The buccal anterolophule is always well developed. The lingual anterolophule is weekly developed in 45 molars (59%) (B variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11) and well developed in 27 molars (36%) (C variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11). It is completely missing only in 4 molars (5 %) (A variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11). The protocone and the paracone is connected only by the protolophule II in 64 molars (83%) (a variation in Table: 2 and in Figure 11). In 10 molars (13%) an incompletely developed protolophule I is found by the side of the protolophule II. (b variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11). In two molars (3%) the two protolophule (I and II) are equally developed (c variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11). The connection is missing in 1 molar (1%) (0 variation in Table 2 and in Figure 11). A short posterior spur of the paracone is visible in eight specimens (2003.81., 100., 101., 104, 114., 127, 138, 145). The mesoloph is long. In 61 molars (76%), it reaches the buccal margin of the tooth crown (variation 1 in Table 2. and in Figure 11), in 19 cases (24%) does not reach the margin of the tooth crown (variation o in Table 2 and in Figure 11). 2003. 43. 2.03 1.36 Aplv 2003. 44. 1.23 ApOv 2003. 45. 1.95 1.19 Aplv 2003. 46. 2.00 1.27 BpO\ 2003. 47. 2.17 1.34 Aplv 2003. 48. 1.90 1.18 ApOv 2003. 49. 2.09 1.26 ApOv 2003. 50, figure 9: 7 1.96 1.33 Aplv 2003. 51. 2.13 1.37 BpOv 2003. 52. 2.04 1.33 Aplv 2003. 53. 1.90 1.22 ApOv 2003. 54. 2.13 1.30 Ap 1v 2003. 55. 2.03 1.3-1 ApOv 2003. 56. 1.90 1.23 Aplv 2003. 57. 1.90 1.26 ApOv 2003. 58. 1.90 1.26 Aplv 2003. 59. 2.10 1.30 ApOv 2003. 60. 1.96 1.26 Aplv 2003. 61, figure 10: 1 2.07 1.33 AxOv 2003. 62. 2.06 1.30 ApOv 2003. 63. 1.92 1.23 .ApOv 2003. 64. 1.88 1.26 BpOv 2003. 65. 1.95 1.20 BxOv 2003. 66. 1.89 1.27 \p()w 2003. 67. 1.97 1.22 Aplv 2003. 68. 1.95 1.26 Aplw 2003. 69. 2.03 1.26 ApOv 2003. "o. 1.85 1.19 AaOv 2003.71. 1.96 1.22 ApOv 2003. 72. 1.97 1.19 ApOv 2003. 73. 2.00 1.27 Aplv 2003. 74. 2.21 1.36 ApOv 2003. 75, figure 10:2 1.96 1.30 Axlv 2003. 76. 1.85 1.23 Aplv 2003. 77. 2.00 1.29 2003. 78. i .9 -i 1.26 2003. 79. 1.93 1.19 ApOv holotype 2003. 80. 1.93 1.19 AaOv KQ 76 79 min. 1.85 1.15 max. 2.21 1.41 X 2.00092 1.27582 Standard deviation 0.06707 0.0464 The metalophule is simple and posteriorly directed in 43 molars (55%) (variation x in Table 2. and in Figure 11). The metalophule bears an extra enamel ridge in 35 molars (45%) (variation y in Table 2 and in Figure 11). A small enamel islet is surrounded by the metacone, metalophule and the terminal part of the posteroloph. The most frequent configuration is Balx, it means a weekly developed lingual anterolophule, presence of protolophule II, absence of protolophule I, mesoloph reaches the buccal margin, and metalophule simple (Figure 11). M 3 molars (Figures 4, 14, 15) — The protocone and a well developed buccal anterolophule are found in the anterior part of the tooth crown. Ungual anterolophule is not developed. The protocone and the paracone is connected by protolophule II in 33 molars (79%) (B variant in Table 3 and in Figure 14). In 5 molars (12%) protolophule I and II are equally developed (A variant in Table 3 and in Figure 14). In two molars (5 %) only the protolophule 1 is developed (C variant in Table 3 and in Figure 14). In two other molars (5%), there is no connection between the protocone and the paracone. This refers the D variant in Table 3 and in Figure 14.