S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 31/2. (Budapest, 1978)

It is worth mentioning that a number of the listed species appeared in Orfamonetraps in French peach orchards as well (CHAMBON et d'AGUILAR 1974). From the point of view of systematics, two facts are remarkable. First, all of the four attracted Grapholitha species belong to the same subgenus (

Aspila Steph.). Secondly, two of the captured fourteen Pammene species (

P. aurana and P. gallicana) are relegated to the genus Laspeyresia by the majority of authors (GOZMÁNY 1967, HANNEMANN 1961, OBRAZTSOV 1959), while DANILEVSKII et KUZNETZOV (1968) regard them, and the other three species of the subgenus EuceRs Hb., to represent Pammene species. The fact that they were lured by the same sexual attractant (cis-8-dodecenil acetate) supports the latter opinion, i.e. - apart from these two species of controversial generic assignment - Laspeyresia species (in contract to Pammene spp. ) do not visit sexual attractant traps for GraphoRtha molesta. Fig. 1: Male genitaRa of Pammene albuginana Gn. - Fig. 2: Male genitaRa of Pammene galRcolana Lienig-Z. The Rst of the moth species reported from Hungary was last drawn up by GOZMÁNY (1967). In this Rst (and in the Rterature since 1967) Pammene suspectana Lienig-Z. was not mentioned from Hungary, consequently this species is new to Hungary. Pammene suspectana Rew into the traps located at one of the three examined areas, at Nagykovácsi-JuRa-major (5 specimens), but it was found in traps (operated recurrently and not discussed in this paper), in Budapest-Budatétény and at Bak (county Vas) as well (fig. 3).