Fogorvosi szemle, 2015 (108. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2015-09-01 / 3. szám

80

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 108. évf. 3. sz. 2015.

4. Buser D1, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE: 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 839-845.

5. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG: Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium sudace. J Dent Res 2004; 7: 529-533.

6. Buser D, Janner SEM, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier ChA, Salvi GE: 10-year survival and succès rates of 511 titanium implants with sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res 2012; 14: 839-851.

7. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP: Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1 -year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-srew implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990; 1: 33-40.

8. Gaggl A, Schulter G, Müller WD, Karchen M: Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser treated titanium implant surfaces - a comparative study. Biomaterials 2000; 21:1067-1073.

9. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Müller WD, Rainer H: Licht- und elektronmikroskopische analyse laserbearbeiteter Titanimplantate. Implantologie 2000; 1: 21-31.

10. Joób FÁ: Fogászati implantátumok felületi morfológiájának vizsgálata. PhD Thesis, Budapest, 2004.

11. Joób FÁ, Divinyi T, Fazekas Á, Daróczi Cs, Karacs A, Pető G: Pulsed laser induced micro and nanosized morphology and composition of titanium dental implants. Smart Materials and Structures 2002] 11: 819-824.

12. Joób FÁ, Kerekes F, Koppány F, Pfeifer B, Divinyi T: Az implantációs sebészeti beavatkozások indikációs területeinek változása a statisztikai vizsgálatok tükrében. Fogorv Szle 2007] 100: 103-107.

13. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piatteli M, Piatteli A: Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 779-784.

14. Pelsőczi Kl, Bereznai M, Tóth Zs, Turzó K, Radnai M, Bor Zs, Fazekas A: Titán minták felületének módosítása excimer lézerrel a hatékonyabb osszeointegráció érdekében. Fogorv Szle 2004; 97: 231-237.

15. Pető G, Karacs A, Pászti Z, Guczi L, Divinyi T, Joób FÁ: Surface treatment of screw shaped titanium dental implants by high intensity laser pulses. Appl Surface Science 2002; 186: 7-13.

16. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J: Bone regeneration in dehistenc-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and convencional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 78-86.

17. Sulzer TH, Bornstein MM, Buser, D: Aktuelles Indikationspektrum in der oralen Implantologie an einer Überweisungsklinik. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2004; 114: 444-450.

18. Magyar Szabadalom P217111/119; 1997

Joób F Á, Divinyi T, Karacs A, Koncz Sz, Pető G, Sulyok L

Survival and success rate of dental implants treated with high intensity laser

Clinical and radiological evaluations have been performed in patients with high energy Nd : glass laser treated dental implants with. These patients underwent dental implantation surgery between 1997 and 2006. Strict success criteria were used for the examination and analysis of implants.

Based on clinical and radiological evaluation, success and survival rates of laser surface treated dental implants were similar to those of sandblasted, acid-etched surface implants frequently reported in the literature. Specific surface morphology and high degree of purity of laser surface treated dental implants ensure excellent osseointegration and a good clinical performance also on the long term.

Keywords: dental implant, success rate, surface morphology, survival rate, laser treated surface, clinical and radiological evaluation