Fogorvosi szemle, 2008 (101. évfolyam, 1-6. szám)

2008-04-01 / 2. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE 101. évf. 2. sz. 2008. 47 2. Backman CA, Oswald RJ, Pitts DL: A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1992; 18: 19-24. 3. Bernáth M, Szabó J: Tissue reaction initiated by different sealers. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 256-261. 4. Briseno BM, Sonnabend E: The influence of different root canal in­struments on root canal preparation: an in vitro study. Int Endod J 1991; 24: 15-23. 5. Broadwater WT, Hoehn RC, King PH: Sensitivity of three selected bacterial species to ozone. Appl Micr 1973; 26: 391-393. 6. Byström A, Sundquist G: Bactériologie evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89: 321-328. 7. Byström A, Happonene RP, Sjögren U, Sundqvist G: Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 58-63. 8. Caldero LG, McHugh S, Mackenzie D, Saunders WP: Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with and without apical enlargement. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 437-446. 9. Cotton WR: Smear layer on dentin. Oper Dent 1984; (Suppl. 3): 1-11. 10. Cunningam WT, Martin H: A scanning electron microscope evalua­tion of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic syner­gistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med. Oral Pathol 1982; 53: 527-531. 11. Dobó-Nagy C, Szabó J, Szabó J: A mathematically based clas­sification of root canal curvatures on natural human teeth. J Endod 1995;21:557-560. 12. Dobó Nagy Cs, Barta K, Bernáth M, Szabó J: A gyökércsatorna tágító műszerek összehasonlító értékelése kihúzott emberi fogakon. III. rész. A hangfrekvenciás és az ultrahang műszerek vizsgálata. Fogorv Szle 1996; 89: 75-85. 13. Eriksen HM, Bjertness E, Orstavik D: Prevalence and quality of endodontic treatment in an urban adult population in Norway. Endod Dent Traumatol t§88\ 4: 122-126. 14. Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP: Treatment outcome in end­odontics: The Toronto study. Phase I: Initial treatment. J Endod 2003; 29: 787-793. 15. Grossmann LI, Shepard LI, Pearson LA: Roentgenologic and clinic­al evaluation of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med. Oral Pathol 1964; 17: 368-374. 16. Grossman LI: Endodontic practice, 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger 1970; 68-94. 17. Hata Gl, Uemura M, Weine F, Toda T: Removal of smear layer in the root canal using oxidative potentional water. J Endod 1996; 22: 643-645. 18. Ingle Jl, Zeldow BJ: An evaluation of mechanical instrumenta­tion and the negative culture in endodontic therapy. J Am Dent As­soc 1958; 57: 471-476. 19. Ingle Jl, Glick D: The Washington study. In: Endodontics (1st edn) (Ingle Jl, ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1965; 54-77. 20. Juhász A, Verdes E, Tőkés L, Kóbor A, Dobö-Nagy Cs: The influ­ence of root canal shape on the sealing ability of two root canal seal­ers. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 282-286. 21. Khabbaz M, Mersini I, Papagiakoumou E: Q-switched versus free running Er: YAG laser efficacy on the root canal walls of human teeth: A SEM study J. Endod. 2004; 30: 585-588. 22. Leonov Bl: Electrocemical activation of water and aqueous solu­tions: Past, present and future. In: Proceedings of the First Interna­tional Symposium on Electrochemical Activation. Las Vegas, USA: RSCECAT, 11-27. 23. Lussi A, Nussbacher U, Grosrey J: A novel non-instrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system. J Endod 1993; 19: 549-553. 24. Lussi A, Messerli L, Hotz P, Grosrey J: A new non-instrumental technique for cleaning and filling root canals. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 1-6. 25. Lussi A, Portmann P, Nussbacher U, Imwinkelried S, Grosrey J: Comparison of two devices for root canal cleansing by the non-in­strumentation technology (NIT). J Endod 1999; 25: 9-13. 26. Lussi A, Suter B, Fritzsche A, Gygax M, Portmann P: In vivo per­formance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) for root canal obturation. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 352-358. 27. Orstavik D: Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 150-155. 28. Peters LB, Wesselink PR: Periapical healing of endodontically treated teeth in one and two visits obturated in the presence or ab­sence of detectable microorganisms. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 660- 667. 29. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN, Barbakow F: Changes in root ca­nal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution comput­ed tomography. J Endod2001: 27: 1-6. 30. Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Sadiq J, Cruickshank E: Technical standard of root canal treatment in an adult Scottish sub-population. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 382-386. 31. Schilder H: Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974; 18:269-296. 32. Schneider SW: A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg 1971; 32: 271-275. 33. Smith CS, Setchell DJ, Harty FJ: Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy - a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 321-333. 34. Southard DW, Oswald RJ, Natkin E: Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the Roane technique. J Endod 1987; 13: 479-489. 35. Strindberg LZ: Dependence of results of pulp therapy on certain factors. An analytical study based on radiographic and clinical follow­up examination. Thesis. Acta Odontol Scand 1956; 14: Suppl 21. 36. Torabinejad M, Cho Y, Khademi AA, Bakland LK, Shabahang S: The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypoclorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod 2003; 29: 170- 175. 37. Weiger R, Hitzler S, Hermle G, Löst C: Periapical status, qual­ity of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment needs in an urban German population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997; 13: 69-74. 38. Weiger R, Rosendahl R, Löst C: Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressings on the prognosis of teeth with endodontically in­duced periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2000; 33: 219-226. 39. Weiger R, Brückner M, ElAyouti A, Löst C: Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Light­­speed instruments and NiTi hand files. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 483-490. 40. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ: The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975; 1 : 255-262. 41. Wu MK, Wesselink PR, Boersma J: A 1-year follow-up study on leakage of four root canal sealers at different thicknesses. Int Endod J 1995; 28: 185-189. 42. Wu MK, Roris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR: Prevalence and extent of long oval shape of canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Rad Endodon 2000; 89: 739-743. 43. Wu MK, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR: A preliminary study of the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area in the apical canal filed with vertically compacted warm gutta-percha. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 527-535. 44. Wu MK, van der Sluis LWM, Wesselink PR: The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 218-224. 45. Zuolo M, Walton R, Imura N: Histologic evaluation of three end­odontic instrument/preparation techniques. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992; 8: 125-129.

Next

/
  • Elrendezés
  • Igazítás
  • Forgatás
Oldalképek
Tartalom