Verhovayak Lapja, 1947 (30. évfolyam, 1-24. szám)

1947 / Verhovay Journal

For the XXL Convention of the Verhovay Fraternal In­surance Association: Coloman Kolozsvary Charles Uray chairman recording secretary” 58. ) The Board discusses the request for a loan of the Ver­hovay Home of Branch 88, Yatesboro, Pa. Directors Macker and Korosfoy are entrusted with conducting an investigation in loco after which they shall submit their recommendations to the Board of Directors. . 59. ) The Board resolves that a special meeting be called by the National President for the last week of October or the first week of November, to which the directors-elect also shall be in­vited in order that the details and plans of the new promotional system, to be carried into effect in 1948, may be discussed. 60. ) It is unanimously resolved by the Board of Directors that, in view of the persistently rising costs of living, the em­ployees of the Home Office be granted wage increases, effective October 1st, 1947, as follows: a. ) the present temporary cost-of-living allowance of $10 monthly shall be included in the basic wages of each employee and, then, b. ) the wages shall be increased by the following per­PAGE 8 ________________________________ Verhovay centages: up to $150 ................................................ 12.5% from $151 to $200 ..................................... 8 % from $201 to $250 ....................................... 5 ', from $251 to $310 ..................................... 3 % from $311 up ............:............................... 2 r/„ 61. ) The Board considers the petition of the Rev. Dr. John Szabó, Prelate of the Holy Sea, American representative of the Prince Primate of Hungary, on behalf of the St. Ladislaus or­phanage in Buda, and instructs the Home Office to issue Two Hundred Fifty ($250) dollars to the St. Ladislaus orphanage, in care of the Rev. Dr. John Szabó. 62. ) Thanking the directors for their attention, the National President adjourns the meeting at 6:15 P.M. Pittsburgh, Pa., September 19, 1947. Journal November 26, 1947 Fraternal Progress Via Public Relations JOHN BENCZE, National President JOSEPH SZALAY, Vice-president JULIUS MACKER RICHARD PHILLIPS HENRY GROSS JOSEPH TURNER LOUTS VIZI JOHN P. KELEMEN The Veterans of Foreign Wars .'5489 Hall in Nanty Glo, Pa., was the scene of impressive memorial ceremonies held jointly by branches 61, Vintondale, 347, Nettleton, and 380>. Nanty Glo, on Sunday, Novem­ber 9th, when the portraits of five fallen heroes of the Verhovay were presented to the next of kin by the officers of the Association. Attend­ed by a great many miners from the coal fields in western Pennsyl­vania the affair was a fine demon­stration of the fraternal spirit pre­vailing in the mining communities. National President John Bencze, Na­tional Auditor John Sabo, district manaprer I.ouis Cincel, from Pitts­burgh, Pa., and director Louis Vizi from Scalp Level, Pa., represented Verhovay’s membership on this solemn occasion. The ceremonies opened with the posting of colors by the local unit of the VFW and the singing of My Country by the audience. John Ko­vács, President of Branch 386, ex­tended a cordial welcome to the as­sembly and introduced district man­ager Cincel as the Master of Cere­monies. Director Louis Vizi conveyed ex­pressions of deep and lasting sym­pathy, in behalf of the 60,000 mem­bers of the Verhovay, to the be-COLOMAN RE VESZ, National Secretary ALBERT B. ARI, Vice-president JOSEPH PRINCE M D. JOHN KOROSFOY CHARLES SMITH ANDREW DOBOS ALOYSIUS C. FALUSSY Directors. reared families. The Rev. Father McCarthy, pastor of St. Mary’s Ro­man Catholic Church offered the invocation and then, National Audi­tor John Sabo delivered the Ameri­can keynote address. Burgess Gel­­lott Dominic, Commander Mike Kre­­sosky of chapter 3489 of the VFW, arid Lester Greene paid tribute to the memory of the men who had made the supreme sacrifice. A mov­ing memorial address and prayer by the Rev. Stephen Papmeder, pastor of the Vintondale Hungarian Re­formed Church, was followed by the presentation speech of National Pre­sident John Bencze who unveiled the portraits of Frank Hegedűs, Joseph Lol.os, Nicholas Gyürke, Jr., Geza Molnár and Joseph George, present­ing them as the gift of the Verho­vay membership to the bei'eaved pa­rents of these heroes. The memorial committee consist­ing of Stephen Gulyas, president and Peter Szuprak, manager of Branch 61, Stephen Bihari, president, and John Olexa, manager of Branch 347, John Kovács, president, and Jo­seph George, manager of Branch 386, are credited with the arangements of this truly impressive affair. The visitors from Pittsburgh en­joyed the hospitality of Mr. and Mrs. Joseph George before the eeremon­— “is there any magic in winning public favor?” — We have heard a great deal late­ly about the importance of improv­ing Verhovay’s public relations. Some of our critics feel that we are not selling enough insurance through the Journal, while others assert that the Verhovay has failed to effective­ly advertise itself. Some even went so far as to suggest that the Associa­tion avail itself of the services of an advertising expert who should be made editor of the Journal and head of the promotional department. Of course, they never troubled to find out how much an advertising ex­pert, (“top brains” at that) would cost, which is fortunate, for the in­quirers would have fainted upon hearing the amount that would be involved. We submit that the products of some famous advertising experts are more annoying then effective. It is a fact that we have banned from our household several nationally ad- j vertised products just because the j way thew were advertised annoyed us. For instance, as a protest against the insulting “L.S.M.F.T.” routine we’ll “Walk a mile” to avoid Lucky Strikes. We can’t think much of an “expert” who thinks too little of the intelligence of the public. Now, we are no “experts” and that, perhaps, is one of the reasons why we have retained our faith in the mental competence of the gen­eral public. On the other hand, we are not entirely green on the sub­ject of advertising. Promotion being our department, it stands to reason that we found it obligatory to make a study of the theories and tech­niques of advertising with a view of acquiring a working' knowledge of this pretentious ‘science’, it is un­necessary to describe our findings at this time. It is sufficient to as­sert that intelligent advertisers pre­fer the “indirect approach” to the antagonizing technique of direct ad­vertising. The difference between the two is easily recognized if one com­pares the “L.S.M.F.T.” routine with j the Burma Shave jingles, or one of ; the more obnoxious breakfast cereal j programs with the Ford Symphony j Hour. Obviously, those clamoring for ad­vertising experts consider it a loss that we do not resort to the direct approach. Yet, if we were to com­ply with their demands making the Journal a sales-sheet, nobody would read it, regardless of how convinc­ingly we would present the benefits of the Verhovay. The direct approach may be ef­­•- fective with some products appealing to the naivete of juvenile minds. Life insurance, however, cannot be sold by advertising. This particular commodity cannot be advertised ex­cept by making the public conscious of a company or association. Even that is a wasted effort if there is no follow-up. People may “walk a mile” for a Camel, but they won’t take a single step to buy life- insur­ance. The agent, the manager, the organizer is the one to do all the walking. Advertising is only his herald. In the September issue of THE FRATERNAL AGE, under "This, is America — Ruminations of the Edi­tor” we find an excellent analysis of this problem by editor and pub­ies, and of Mr. and Mrs. Stephen Lokos, afterwards. May the bereaved survivors of our hero dead find some measure of comfort in the assurance of the deep sympathy of all Verhovay mem­bers. iisher Malter ftasye. We feel it j presents the answer tó the question Í on hand. He writes: “Is there any magic in winning ! public favor? Advertising, of course. But is there any slight-of-hand or hypnotism that will do it? I have advocated many times Hiat the fraternal system may become ! tremendously popular again by car­rying on its regular services ef­ficiently, conscientiously and ideal­istically, with able leadership. I j referred to the day-by-day work. I can report at this time that the fraternal system is gaining in pub­lic esteem. The big volume of new applications is statistical proof. Rarely do you hear any urfkind words about any society: usually there is praise. , The “fraternity in action” move­ment started by Farrar Newberry is getting results. My idea of that movement is that in itself it is not a selling scheme; it is for the pur­pose of making fraternal members more conscious of their place in their home communities. "Fraternity in action” has result­ed in thousands of local lodges act­ually becoming part in civic projects. In some places they assumed leader­ship. The trouble with many lodges I was that they were exclusive; their j secret meetings resulting in hiding j their good works; the “fraternity in action” program gives them re­cognized work to do. “Fraternity in action” has im­proved our public relations. Also: intelligent selling, prompt and satis­factory payment of claims, better j programs in lodge halls, more ‘co­operation in Fraternal Week meet­ings and less criticism of each other.” “One reason the fraternal sys­tem is making progress and im­proving its standing with the pub- i lie is that we have many executives j who take their jobs seriously. They have ambition, and that ambition is tó make their societies and the fra­ternal system great. They work hard at it; they do not consider then­­jobs as “a warm place to read the paper in the morning.” This, we feel, is a competent answer to the demand for aggres­sive, direct advertising. If there is anything to be added, it is this: there is no short-cut to promotional success. Advertising cannot dó the work of enthusiastic organizers. But enthusiastic, capable organizers and a satisfied membership are our best advertisement . No matter how grandious claims the Association would advertise, if the branches, ; their members and officers, dó riot j live up to those claims, there will be no progress. This does not mean that we don’t believe in advertising. We do. And we do advertise. We use the direct irlethod when it is not contrary to good taste. As a rule, however, we apply the indirect method. And the advancement of the Association proves that it is the right method. TO THE CONTRIBUTORS The next issue of the Journal) will be published on Wednesday, December 10th. Contributions for that issue should be in not later than December 3rd, Wednesday. Contributions should be type­written, on one side of the paper only, double spaced, and not ex­ceed 1,200 words, or 6,000 letters. Address contributions to VÉR­­! HOVAY JOURNAL, ENGLISH SECTION, 436 Fourth Aye., Pittsburgh 19, Pa. — ■ FIVE PORTRAITS PRESENTED IN NANTY GLO CEREMONIES Verhovay Miners In Pennsylvania Pay Tribute To Hero Dead.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents