Verhovayak Lapja, 1947 (30. évfolyam, 1-24. szám)

1947 / Verhovay Journal

Why Change The Provisions Of The Sick Benefit Department? FAGE6___________________________________Verhovay Journal______________________________October 8, 1947 DOUBLE INDEMNITY (Continued from page 5) excesive claims resulting from such exceptional cases. While the average member’s privileges will not be affected in any way by these amend­ments, they will, undoubtedly, serve to strengthen the Sick Benefit Fund of the Associa­tion, since it is the excessive claims growing out of unusual cases that represent its great­est burden. Naturally, the question will be asked: “It the Sick Benefit Fund of the Verhovay in such bad shape that it needs strengthening?” The answer is: No, it is not in bad shape, and, yes, it needs strengthening. This sounds like a contradiction, but it isn’t as will be shown by the following. The Condition of the Sick Benefit Fund. We quote from the report of ► the Certified Public Account­ant to the National Conven­tion: “The Disability Fund col­lects additional dues from members who desire health protection; it pays sick, maim­ing and birth benefits and should pay its share of ex­pense incurred in the adminis­tration of such benefits. However, with the exception of a very small amount for medical examiners’ fees, this Fund has not borne any bur­den for expense. The Insur­ance Department has object­ed to the manner in which this Fund is operated and has requested that the dues for sick benefits should be estab­lished on an actuarial insur­ance basis and should be operated accordingly. The fact that this Fund has collected dues in the amount of $593,- 204.07 during the four year period and has paid out $512,- 801.13 for sick benefits during the same period makes it ob­vious that the dues paid by your members have been in­adequate for the operation of this Fund.” In compliance with the in­structions of the Insurance Department, the actuary of the Association has made a complete evaluation of the Sick Benefit Fund of the Ver­hovay. While his findings were similar to those of the C.P.A., his conclusions were more favorable. What is most important: he found that it will not be necessary to in­crease the dues of the Sick Benefit Department. This, in itself, proves the STRENGTH of our Sick Benefit Fund which is further substantiated by the fact that the Insurance Department concurred with the opinion of our actuary. Both agreed, however, that some changes in the provisions are necessary if the Sick Be­nefit Department is to be brought up to modern busi­ness standards which is some­thing the Insurance Depart­ment rightfully insists upon. This insistence has become increasingly emphatic during the last few years. Some so­cieties, convinced of the ade­quacy of their sick benefit funds, have tried to resist the demands of the Insurance De­partments and, as a result, one of the 100% Hungarian fraternal societies, since then merged with another, found itself compelled to close its branches in the State of New York. Naturally, Verhovayans do not want to force their Association into a similar posi­tion and, therefore, nothing­­remains but to cooperate with the entirely justified demands of the Insurance Departments. What, actually, is the de­mand of the Insurance De­partment? The answer is sim­ple: it demands that health insurance be put on' a legal reserve basis. The Association was faced with the same de­mand, in reference to its Mor­tuary Fund, in 1924, when the transition to legal reserve life insurance was effected. Now the insurance authorities have gone one step further. They demand that health insur­ance also, be put on the legal reserve basis. This means that all present and future health insurance lia­bilities must be backed up by adequate reserves in the Sick Benefit Fund. This demand can be met by some societies only by an increasing of the rates, and by others by de­creasing the benefits. The strength of Verhovay’s Sick Benefit Fund is proven by the fact that no such radical changes are necessary. The moderate adjustments made by the above outlined amend­ments will strengthen the re­serves of the Sick Benefit De­partment so as to increase its solvency to 100%. Nothing more is asked, nothing less will suffice. We feel that out fellow­­members, if acquainted with the above facts, will gladly give their approval to the amendments of the Sick Be­nefit By-laws, adopted by the XXI. National Convention. Sad ending to Jack and the Bean­stalk: Beanstalk got so high, Jack couldn’t buy the beans. — The Insurance Story Of A This is the story of the late Mi­chael Sitko, one of the four sons of Mr. and Mrs. Stephen Sitko of Wil­liamson, W. Va., all of whom had served through World War II., and, then, returned to civilian life. Of the four probably Michael saw the most action, judging from the deco­rations awarded to him in recogni­tion of gallantry in action. Upon returning from the war, all four applied for reinstatement in both the Sick Benefit and Accidental Death Benefit Classes of the As­sociation. The application of Mi­chael, who joined the Verhovay at Branch 343 in January 1932, was re­jected by the chief medical adviser of the Association, though he was automatically reinstated in the Acci­dental Death Benefit Class. It didn't mater, after all, for he wouldn’t have benefitted from his membership in the Sick Benefit Department any­how, while his reinstatement in the Accidental Death Benefit Depart­ment proved an act of Providence. Upon his return to civilian life, Michael found employment at the Scamnel China Company in Trenton, N. J., where he became a member by transfer of Branch 13. He has worked there for a year when a tragic accident occurred. Michael fell from a hayloft, while at work. The unconscious young man was rushed to the St. Francis Hospital in Tren­ton where he expired 5 days later, on September 8th, 1947. Father and mother were his bene­ficiaries to whom the death bene­fits were paid. Michael had a $1,000 membership certificate with the re­instated Double Indemnity Rider at­tached. Thus, the mourning parents received $2,000 after their son who survived the dangers and horrors of war only to lose his life in an ac­cident a year and a half after his return. This story is told for the benefit of our veterans. More than 6,000 members of the Verhovay had serv­ed with the armed forces in World War II., and nearly 1,500 of them were members of either or both the Sick Benefit and Accidental Death Benefit Departments. In accordance with the provisions of the By-laws the sick and accident benefit mem­bership certificates of these fellow­­members had been cancelled upon their induction, with the understand­ing, however, that the applications for reinstatement of these fellow­­members, if filed shortly after their return, will be given preferred treat­ment by the Association. Yet, many of our veterans appear reluctant to Veteran Who Died At Home. — apply for reinstatement in the sick benefit and accidental death bene­fit classes. Though this may be un­derstandable in some instances, still the case of the late Michael Sitko proves how great a loss may be in­curred if these privileges are not restored. Had Michael Sitko not ap­plied for his reinstatement, his pa­rents would have lost, in addition to their beloved son, a thousand dol- Issr in benefits. Had he assumed a resentful attitude because of the re­jection of his application for rein­statement in the Sick Benefit De­partment, insisting, like so many others, that if he couldn’t get back all of his privileges then he wanted none of them, his parents may have lost all of the benefits. But Michael Sitko acted like a sensible man. Ac­cepting his rejection from the Sick Benefit Department, he still kept his original membership certificate in force and availed himself of the privilege of reinstating his Double Indemnity certificate. He could not save his beloved parents from the bitter sorrow of losing their son, but he was able, thereby, . to extend, as a last act of filial love, his helping hand toward them. In view of the ever increasing hazards of civilian life, it seems foolish to drop any protection risk­ing, thereby, benefits which may be­come a source of comfort and help to our loved ones in the darkest hour of need and sorrow. In most in­stances, such protection has been purchased originally by the parents who continued paying its costs for many years, often at a great sacri­fice to themselves. It seems more an act of ingratitude, than any­thing else, when a member simply neglects, or purposely forgets about his membership privileges, which have cost his parents many a self­­denial. While gaining very little, actually only a few cents each month, his loved ones may lose what, in many instances, may become their only resource. That one has survived the war does not mean that he will survive the risks and dangers of “peaceful” living. We hope, there­fore, that the lesson of the tragic story of the late Mifhael Sitko will not be lost on our veteran fellow­­members and that they will decide to apply for the restoration^"of all of the membership privileges which they had enjoyed before entering the armed forces. Calamity strikes when it is least expected and against its tragic effects on our loved ones pre­paredness by all-around protection is the only defense. NEVER QUIT! When things go wrong, as they sometimes will, When the road you're trudging seems all up hill, When the funds are low and the debts are high, And you want to smile, but you have to sigh, When care is pressing you down a bit, Rest, if you must—but don't you quit. Life is queer with its twists and turns, .4s everyone of us sometimes learns, And many a failure turns about When he might have icon had he stuck it out; Don’t give up, though the pace seems slow— You might succeed with another blow. Success is failure turned inside out— The silver tint of the clouds of doubt— And you never can tell how close you are, It may be near when it seems afar; So stick to the fight when you’re hardest hit— It’s when things seem worst that you mustn't quit. —AUTHOR UNKOWN.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents