Verhovayak Lapja, 1947 (30. évfolyam, 1-24. szám)

1947 / Verhovay Journal

October 8, 1947 Verhovay Journal Representatives Still In Now that the delegates to Verhovay’s National Conven­tion have returned to their homes we would like to remind them that their term has not yet expired. Past experience has made this reminder neces­sary, now more so than ever, because many of the districts insisted that the Board of Di­rectors shall have no author­ity to act in matters reserved for the jurisdiction of the na­tional convention. The officers and directors of the Verhovay were always con­scious of the lawful limita­tions of their authority. It was for this reason that short­ly after the Convention in 1943 a resolution authorizing a $25,000 donation to the Ame­rican Hungarian Relief, Inc., was submitted for action to the members of the XX-th Nation­al Convention by the Board of Directors. The Resolution was adopted by the overwhelming majority, but quite a number of the delegates refused to vote on the ground that they “had not been empowered by the district meeting to vote upon such a matter”. Obviously, these representa­tives were unaware of the real scope of their authority. At the convention they voted upon many important issues which previously had not been dis­cussed at the district meet­ings. Yet, they voted, even though they had received no instructions from their dis­tricts as to the course to be taken by them in reference to unexpectedly arising issues. They voted and their action was legal because as duly elect­ed representatives of the mem­bership they were empowered to act in accordance with their own judgment. A representa­tive is free to vote in accord­ance with the dictates of his own conscience and judgment: therein lies the essence of re­presentative government. This right of the representative does not expire with the adjourn­ment of the legislative body. It remains in effect through­out the term for which the representative is elected. In fact, as long as he is not un­der impeachment, his consti­tuents are unable to control his actions. He may vote con­trary to the sentiments and convictions of his constituents, he may go his own sweet way without paying any attention to their demands, there is no­thing they can do about it un­til the end of his term. Then, if he has not truly represent­ed them, they may refuse to re-elect him, but no other ac­tion can be taken against him. In Verhovay’s system of gov­ernment the National Conven­tion represents the legislature. In cases of emergency the ne­cessity for enacting some sort of law may arise, though the -emergency may not be of such serious nature as to warrant the' calling of a special con­vention. In such instances the delegates are notified by mail of the issue to be acted upon and they are expected to cast their votes just as if the con­vention were in session. Na­turally, when a vote is taken between conventions, the is­sue cannot be debated on the floor and the delegates are de­prived of hearing and taking part in the arguments which, as a rule, are conductive to intelligent action. For this rea­son, however, involved issues are seldom, if ever, submitted for a vote by mail. The mat­ters to be acted upon during the interim, between conven­tions, are simple, clear-cut questions, requiring no more, nor less than a mere “aye” or “no”, in accordance with the judgement of each representa­tive. To refuse to vote on a sim­ple, clear-cut question like that amounts to the' refusal of one’s obligations as representa­tive of the membership. A re­presentative is elected because the constituents trust his judgment and, therefore, it is a poor representative who dare not trust his own judgment. To refuse to vote on the ground that he has not been instruct­ed by his district is an act of naivete resting on an erron­eous conception of the dis­tricts’ jurisdiction. For Chap­ter II., paragraph 8 of the By­laws reads: . . the second meeting (of the Districts is to be held) in November of the same year for the purpose of ratifying the amendments to the Constitution and By-Laws adopted at the Convention.” In other words, the post-con­vention district meetings have no business whatsoever to give any kind of instructions to the representatives. Their sole business consists in either ratifying or rejecting the amendments to the Constitu­tion and By-laws adopted at the Convention. The idea that those actions of the Convention which have no connection with the By­laws, also are to be approved and that no future actions of such nature can be taken with­out previous authorization by the district meetings, is the outgrowth of the underestima­tion of the authority and juris­diction of the National Con­vention as the legislative body of the Association. It is based on the notion that the dis-Office-----­trict sessions are above the National Convention, which is not true. Such being the case, the de­legates to the XXI. National Convention will do well to bear in mind that they may be re­quired to vote upon some is­sues which had not yet arisen at the time of the convention was in session. Since their term wall not expire before September, 1951, they will have full authority, and it will be their duty, to vote on all mat­ters which belong to the juris­diction of the national con­vention. Some of the districts which had maintained only recently that the Board of Directors have overstepped the limits of their authority, seem to be un­aware that it was their repre­sentatives who refused to vote the last time when they were required to vote by mail. If they do not want to grant the directors the right to act, but refuse to take action them­selves, then how in the world can any action be taken on matters the disposal of which cannot be postponed? The de­legates to the XXth Conven­tion were required to vote by mail on the question of whe­ther or not the Association should contribute $25,000 to­ward the alleviation of the desperate need of the Hun­garian people. Surely, this was not,a question to be postponed until September, 1947?! Problems of similarly ur­gent nature may arise in the future. It is important, there­fore, that every delegate to the National Convention be’ aware of his authority to act as a representative of the membership. A representative may choose not to vote, but not on the ground that he has received no instructions from his constituency. This is a poft- subterfuge for those not daring to express their judg­ment one way or tlié other/ It is the moral duty of every elected representative of the Association to exercise his au­thority to the end of his term. That is the only way for main­taining democratic govern­ment. Incidentally, several of the districts demanding that the representatives be polled when matters beyond the jurisdic­tion of th£ Board of Directors are to be acted upon, spoke of this procedure as a “referen­dum vote”. The taking of a vote by mail is not a referen­dum vote. The term “referen­dum” denotes the practice of referring measures passed upon or proposed by the legislative body to the electorate, in this case to the general member-Delegates Boost Success Of Hungáriáim Relief Dance The benefit dance held by Chap­ter 117 of the American Hungarian Relief, Inc., in the English Room of Hotel Fort Pitt, Pittsburgh, Pa., on September 13th, was a great suc­cess. The huge ball-room was filled beyond capacity and the dance floor was simply jammed. Busiest people were the Reception Committee and the ticket sellers whose jobs kept them on the run until midnight. Chapter 117 took a bow on this occasion before the representatives of Hungarian settlements in IV states of the union, for the dele­gates to the XXI. National Conven­tion of the Verhovay attended in a body, and many of them had eve« their wives come to Pittsburgh for this unusual event. Hoi’vath Guszti’s gipsy orchestra, furnished the music, untiringly, for the guests hardly ever had a chance to rest. Vocal soloes were rendered by Gusztáv Horvath, Joseph Gero of the Hungarian radio program, ai«4 Emery Florian, Hungarian steno­grapher, whose cultured baritone brought the house down. Bill Kohut introduced the dance Committee: Miss Yolanda Bencze, chairman, Mrs. Yolanda Diera, Mr3. Margaret Beres, Miss Vilma Balogh, Miss Helen Erdeky, Miss Manci Pr­­deky, Miss Peggy Evans and Miss Mollie Konscoll. Among the dancers the greatest applause was accorded to Conven­tion chairman and Mrs. Coloman Kolozsvary who really proved that Hungarians will dance as long as they live. The financial success was impres­sive, to say the least. The dance netted $585.00 for the relief-work of Chapter 117 of the America« Hungarian Relief, Inc. Again Pitts­burgh’s young folks have proven that the secret of success lies not in numbers hut in cooperation, or­ganization and devotion to the cause. This small group, unusually strong on all three counts, has chalked up another great victory to the lasting credit of every worker and officer of Chapter 117. Hungarians of Pitts­­burgh and the Verhovay delegates from all over the country are grate­ful for this fine example of leader­ship and cooperation and for the wonderful time they had a! thi* Relief Dance. PAGE 7 Every day something gets done that couldn’t be done. A narrow mind slider right through the facts. Nothing pays poorer than spitework. There’s some good in everyone but it’s not nearly so interesting. ship. According to the By-laws of the Association a referen­dum vote can be taken only if the dissolution of the Associa­tion were to be recommended. In reference to all other mat­ters beyond thfe jurisdiction of the Board of Directors, the Convention is the highest fo­rum, and the members of the Convention, elected for a four year term, have every author­ity to act as the Convention whenever the Convention is not in session.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents