Szemészet, 2020 (157. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2020-03-01 / 1. szám

Introduction of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques

Irodalom

1. America EBAo. 2016 Eye Banking Statistical Report. 2017; Available from: http://restoresight.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/201B_ Statistical_Report-Final-040717.pdf.

2. Anshu A, Price M0, Price FW, Jn Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 536-540.

3. Bachmann B, Schaub F Cursiefen C. [Treatment of corneal endothelial disorders by DMEKand UT-DSAEK. Indications, complications, results and follow-up], Ophthalmologe 2016; 113: 196-203.

4. Busin M, Patel AK, Scorcia V, Ponzin D. Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei 2012; 53: 521-524.

5. Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwan from 1987 to 1999. Cornea 2001; 20: 141-144.

6. Dobbins KR, Price FW, Jr., Whitson WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States. Cornea 2000; 19: 813-816.

7. Flockerzi E, Maier P Bohringer D, Reinshagen H, Kruse F Cursiefen C, Reinhard T, Geerling G, Torun N, Seitz B, all German Keratoplasty Registry C. Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 188: 91-98.

8. Fuest M, Ang M, Htoon HM, Tan D, Mehta JS. Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 182: 62-71.

9. Gain R Jullienne R, He Z, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmology 2016; 134: 167-173.

10. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; 25: 886-889.

11. Guerra FR Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2368-2373.

12. Keenan TD, Jones MN, Rushton S, Carley FM, National Health Service B, Transplant Ocular Tissue Advisory G, Contributing 0. Trends in the indications for corneal graft surgery in the United Kingdom: 1999 through 2009. Arch Ophthalmol 2012; 130: 621-628.

13. Marques RE, Guerra PS, Sousa DC, Goncalves Al, Quintas AM, Rodrigues W. DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019; 29: 15-22.

14. McNeill Jl. Flared phacoemulsification tips to decrease ultrasound

time and energy in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1433-1436.

15. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006; 25: 987-990.

16. Melles GR, Remeijer L, Geerards AJ, Beekhuis WH. The future of lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1999; 10: 253-259.

17. Minassian DC, Rosen R Dart JK, Reidy A, Desai R Sidhu M, Kaushal S, Wingate N. Extracapsular cataract extraction compared with small incision surgery by phacoemulsification: a randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 822-829.

18. Price DA, Kelley M, Price FW, Jr., Price MO. Five-Vear Graft Survival of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet Stripping EK and the Effect of Donor Sex Matching. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 1508-1514.

19. Schrittenlocher S, Bachmann B, Tiurbe AM, Tuac 0, Velten K, Schmidt D, Cursiefen C. Impact of preoperative visual acuity on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) outcome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257: 321-329.

20. Sheldon CA, McCarthy JM, White VA. Correlation of clinical and pathologic diagnoses of corneal disease in penetrating keratoplasties in Vancouver: a 10-year review. Can J Ophthalmol 2012; 47: 5-10.

21. Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, Shortt AJ. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 6: CD012097.

22. Ting DS, Sau CY, Srinivasan S, Ramaesh K, Mantry S, Roberts F Changing trends in keratoplasty in the West of Scotland: a 10-year review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 405-408.

23. Tóth G SG, Gyenes A, Seitz B, Nagy ZZ, Szentmáry N. Immune reactions following keratoplasty - classification and treatment. Szemészet 2017; 154: 19-28.

24. Wang J, Hasenfus A, Schirra F Bohle RM, Seitz B, Szentmáry N. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Homburg/Saar from 2001 to 2010—histopathology of 1,200 corneal buttons. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 797-802.

25. Zhu L, Zha Y, Cai J, Zhang Y. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol 2018; 38: 897-905. Zirm EK. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total eratoplasty). 1906. Refract Corneal Surg 1989; 5: 258-261.

26. Zirm EK. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (A successful total keratoplasty). 1906. Refract Corneal Surg 1989; 5: 258-261.

Levelezési cím

Dr. Pluzsik Milán Tamás, Semmelweis Egyetem, ÁOK, Szemészeti Klinika 1085 Budapest, Mária u. 39. E-mail: milan.pluzsik@gmail.com