Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 84. (Budapest 1992)

Kováts, D.: Waldstein and Kitaibel types in the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest

Mespilus coccinea W. et K. - Icon. Pl. Rar. III. 1809: 284, tab. 256. - 3 sheets: XIV No. 194, 194a, 195. Two of them are Cotoneaster integgerima MEDIC, the third one is C. orientális (MILL.) BORB. (= C. tomentosa (AIT.) LINDL.), according to JÁVORKA (1934: 164). The valid name is Cotoneaster nebrodensis (Guss.) C. KOCH (1853) (= C. tomentosus LINDLEY), according to TUTIN et al. (1968: 72), Cotoneaster tomentosus (AIT.) LINDL. (1822) (= Mespilus coccinea W. et K.) according to JÁVORKA (1934: 164, 1957: 159), Soó (1966: 98, 1980: 289), PRISZTER (1985:153), DOSTÁL (1989: 490), C. integerrima MEDIC. (1793) is an independent species according to Soó (1966: 98,1980: 289), TUTIN et al. (1968: 72), PRISZTER (1985:153). The specimen on the sheet XIV No. 194, which was designated as the lectotype, consists of a leafy stem with five leaves. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Mespilus coccinea E valle Zsilavna in Cottu Thúrócziensi adtulit C. Waldstein. Differt a Cotoneastro: floribus terminalibus, fructibus hirsutis". In JÁVORKA (1934: 164): "Cotoneaster orientális (Mill.) Borb. = tomentosa (Ait.) Lindl." On the author's label: "Cotoneaster tomentosus (Ait.) Lindley. Leaves suborbicular, broadly ovate or elliptical, obtuse, with white pubescence on the back, sparsely pubescent on the upper side, petiole tomentose. 30. 01.1992. D. Kováts". Orobus laevigatus W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1809: 270, tab. 243. - 3 sheets: XXIV No. 53, 54; LH. No. 71. The valid (synonym) name is Lathyrus laevigatus (W. et K.) FRITSCH, according to JÁVORKA (1957: 169), L. transsilvanicus RICHB. subsp. transsilvanicus DOST, according to Soó (1966: 364), L. laevigatus (W. et K.) GREN. subsp. laevigatus, according to TUTIN et al. (1968: 138), Lathyrus laevigatus (W. et K) GREN. subsp. transsylvanicus (Spr.) BREIST. according to Soó (1980: 324), PRISZTER (1985: 164), Lathyrus laevigatus (W. et K.) GREN. according to PROKUDIN et al. (1987: 204), DOSTÁL (1989: 543). The specimen on the sheet XXIV. No. 53, which was designated as the lectotype, there is one upper part of a leafy stem branching into inflorescences with many flowers. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Orobus laevigatus mihi In Mersin et Plissivicza". On the author's label: "Lathyrus laevigatus (W. et K.) Gren. subsp. laevigatus. Glabrous, leaflets 18-20 mm wide, elliptical to ovate, lower calyx-teeth less than 1/3 as long as tube. 05. 02. 1992. D. Kováts". Pastinaca opopanax W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1806: 233, tab. 211. - 1 sheet: XI. No. 111. The valid (synonym) name is Opopanax chironium (L.) KOCH (1824), according to JÁVORKA (1957: 160), TUTIN et al. (1968: 360). The specimen on this sheet XI. No. Ill, which is the type, consist of two upper parts of stems, one of them leafy the other one branches into umbels (with fruits) and a separate lower leaf and some fragments of leaves. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Pastinaca Opopanax Ad Koreniczam cum Ferula nodiflora". In JÁVORKA (1934: 186): "Opopanax chironium (L.) Koch". On the author's label: "Opopanax chironium (L.) Koch. Leaflets ovate, obtuse, obliquely cordate at base, rachis and petiole sparsely hispid, few involucres. 05. 02. 1992. D. Kováts". * Peucedanuni longifolium W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1809: 279, tab. 251. -.2 sheets: X. No. 173, 177. This is the valid name according to JÁVORKA (1934: 189,1957:160), TUTIN et al. (1968: 361). The specimen on the double sheet X. No. 177, which was designated as the lectotype, consists of a leafy plant, broken into three parts, a separate lower leafand an umbel without flowers and fruits. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Peucedanuni longifolium In rupibus calc. Csiklovae, Szászkae, ad thermas Herculis. Floret sub medium Julii". Pimpinella glauca W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. I. 1801: 73, tab. 72. - non L. in JÁVORKA (1934: 195). 5 sheets: XI. No. 127, 128, 129, 130; XLI. No. 83. The valid (synonym) name is Trinia kitaibelii M. B. according to JÁVORKA (1934: 195), "Trinia kitaibelii auct. hungaricorun, non M. B. = T. ramosissima Fisch, sec. Soó ined" in JÁVORKA (1957: 160), T. ramosissima FISCHER em. RCHB. according to Soó (1966: 453), Trinia ramosissima (FISCHER ex TREV.) KOCH (1824), according to TUTIN et al. (1968: 351), PRISZTER (1985: 169), Trinia ucrainica SCHISCHKIN, according to BERTOVÁ (1984: 311-313), DOSTÁL (1989: 690), Trinia kitaibelii BIEB., according to PROKUDIN et al. (1987: 232). The specimen on the sheet XLI. No. 83, which was designated as the lectotype, consists of a plant with root, leaves and inflorescences (fruits). On KITAIBEL'S label: "Pimpinella glauca Ad Harsány initio Augusti". On JÁVORKA'S label: "Trinia Kitaibelii M. B. 1907. VII. revid. Jáv.". Plantago hungarica W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1805: 225, tab. 203. - 3 sheets: VII. No. 162; LVII. No. 152, 161. The valid (synonym) name is P. dubia L. sec. ASCHERSON, according to JÁVORKA (1935: 56), P. lanceolata var. eriophora HoFFMSGG. et LINK., according to JÁVORKA (1957: 160), P. lanceolata L. subsp. eriophora (HOFFMANNS et LINK) JÁV var. hungarica (W. et K.) GREC, according to Soó (1968: 258), Plantago lanceolata