Matskási István (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 84. (Budapest 1992)

Kováts, D.: Waldstein and Kitaibel types in the Hungarian Natural History Museum in Budapest

L. according to TUTIN et al. (1976: 42), Plantago lanceolata L. subsp. dubia (L.) DOST according to Soó (1980: 385), PRISZTER (1985: 186). The specimens on the sheet VII. No. 162, which was designated as the lectotype, consist of four plants (one of them is in bad condition) with roots, leaves and inflorescences (fruits). On KITAIBEL'S label: "Plantago hungarica". On the author's label: "Plantago lanceolata subsp. eriophora (Hoffmanns et Link) Jáv. (= subsp. dubia (L.) Dostál). Several rosettes, stems strongly 5-sulcate, pubescent or villous, leaves linear-lanceolate to lanceolate, 4-5 veined, pubescent or villous, inflorescences oblong-ovate. 04. 02. 1992. D. Kováts". Plantago sericea W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. II. 1803: 163, tab. 151. - 3 sheets: VII. No. 168,169; LVIII. No. 14. The valid name is Plantago argentea CHAIX in VILL. (1786), according to JÁVORKA (1935: 57, 1957: 160), Soó (1968: 256,1980: 385), TUTIN et al. (1976: 42), PRISZTER (1985: 186). The specimens on the double sheet VII. No. 168, which was designated as the lectotype, consist of six plants, four of them with roots, leaves and inflorescences (fruits), two of them only with leaves. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Plantago sericea In montibus calcareis ad Inotam, Palotám, Füred, Harsány". In JÁVORKA (1935: 57): "a Horhi". On the author's label: "Plantago argentea Chaix. Few rosettes, leaves linear-lanceolate, attenuate, entire, shortly appressed-hairy, inflorescences cylindrical-globular. 05. 02.1992. D. Kováts". * Ranunculus pedalus W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. II. 1802: 112, tab. 108. - 2 sheets: XVI. No. 239, 240. This is the valid name according to JÁVORKA (1935: 90, 1957: 163), TUTIN et al. (1964: 231), Soó (1966: 78, 1980: 286). BERTOVÁ (1982: 171-173), PRISZTER (1985: 151), PROKUDIN et al. (1987: 51), DOSTÁL (1989: 276). The specimens on the sheet XVI. No. 239, which was designated as the lectotype, consist of six plants with roots, leaves and inflorescences (flowers and fruits), two upper parts of leafy stems with inflorescences (flowers and fruits) and one leafy plant with root, without inflorescences. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Ranunculus pedatus ausser Gyöngyös", Ranunculus and ausser written by an unknown person. * Ranunculus scutatus W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. II. 1804: 205. tab. 187. - 2 sheets: XVI. No. 195a, 196; and an another sheet: XVI. No. 195, under the name of R. thora L., according to JÁVORKA (1935: 91). The valid name is Ranunculus scutatus W. et K. according to JÁVORKA (1957: 163). TUTIN et al. (1964: 234). The specimens on the sheet XVI. No. 195a, which was designated as the lectotype, consist of three upper parts of leafy plants, two of them with flowers, one of them with fruits. On KITAIBEL'S label: "aus der Kuppe von Plissivicza". On JÁVORKA'S label: "Ranunculus scutatus W. et K.. ad thoren accedem revid. Jáv.". * Rhamnus tinctoria W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1809: 283. tab. 255. - 3 sheets: IX. No. 138; XLI. No. 224; XLVI. No. 66. and an another sheet: IX. No. 137, under the name of Rli. cardiocarpus WILLD. according to JÁVORKA (1936: 93). The valid name is Rhamnus saxatilis JACQ. subsp. tinctorius (W. et K.) NYMAN, according to Soó (1966: 425-426. 1980: 332), TUTIN et al. (1968: 244-245), Rltamnus tinctoria W. et K. according to JÁVORKA (1925: 699), PROKUDIN et al. (1987: 241). The specimens on the double sheet IX. No. 138. which was designated as the lectotype, consist of three branchy stems with leaves and fruits, two other leafy stems with JÁVORKA'S label: "an Prunus?". On KITAIBEL'S label: "Rhamnus In Syrmii fruticetis longior ramus est e monte arcis Devae". On JÁVORKA'S label: "Rh. tinctorius W. et K. revid. Jávorka". Rosa reversa W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1810: 239, tab. 264. - 1 sheet in the Herbarium Wolnyanum. The valid name is Rosa "pendulina Kit. v. reversa W. et K, apud Degen est planta hybrida inter R. pendulinam et pimpinellifoliam" according to JÁVORKA (1957: 164). It is a hybrid species of R. pendulina x spinosissima < = pimpinellifolia), according to Soó (1966: 227), too. The specimen on the sheet - inventory number: 173912 - which is the tvpe. consists of a leafy stem with one fruit. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Rosa reversa No. 18." On the authors label: "Rosa pendulina L. x pimpinellifolia I.. Pedicel is upright, fruit is ovoid to elongate-pyriform. pedicel and fruit with glandular-hispid, some leaves double serrate. 10.12. 1991. D. Kováts". Rubus agrestis W. et K. - Icon. PI. Rar. III. 1810: 297. tab. 268. - 2 sheets: XLIX. No. 12. 13. under the name of R. canus KIT according to GAYER in JÁVORKA (1936: 7). This is a hybrid species: Rubus caesiusx tomentosus sec. GAYER, according to JÁVORKA (1925: 510.1957: 164). The specimen on the sheet XLIX. No. 12, which was designated as the lectotype. consists of a leafy stem with buds and flowers. On KITAIBEL'S label: "Rubus canus mihi an tomentosus Willd. Ad Szalatnyam et Palásd in Hont Cottu et in Banatu". One other label: "Rubus agrestis W. K. (caesius x tomentosus) rev. Gayer 1917 VI."