Technikatörténeti szemle 8. (1975-76)
MŰSZAKI SZAKMÚZEUMOK - Vajda Pál: Ipari régészet – műszaki emlék-védelem
12. László Gyula: A honfoglaló magyar nép története, Bp. 1944. 13. Lásd 1. 14. Boldogréti Vig László: Magyar és Erdély országi születésű külföldi Könyv nyomtatókról. 15. (Trattner János Tamás): Beszámoló a magyarországi nyomdászatról. = Tudományos gyűjtemény n. 1818. 16. Jasiuk, Jezy: Die Denkmäler der Technik von Theoretischen und praktischen Gessichtspunkt aus gesehen. Warszawa. 17. Vajda Pál: Ipari régészet Angliában. = Technikatörténeti Szemle 1970. p. 300-302. 18. Réthly A.: 70 éves az Országos Meteorológiai Intézet = Az időjárás XLIV.(1940.) 19. Lambrecht Kálmán: Hermán Ottó, az utolsó magyar polihisztor. Budapest, 1920. 20. A Népközt. Ein. Tan. 1963. évi 9.sz. törvényerejű rendelete a muzeális emlékek védelméről. = Magyar Közlöny 1963. május 11. p. 212-215. A közlekedés- és.postaügyi miniszter 28/1968. (Közi. Ért. 11.) KPM számú utasítása a közlekedési, postai és távközlési muzeális emlékek védelméről. 21. Bor Ambrus: Ipari műemlékeink. = Magyar Nemzet, 1971. dec. 16. INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY - PROTECTION TECHNICAL MONUMENTS IN HUNGARY Hungary has been the first country to adopt a law-decree in 1954 on the state protection of technical and industrial monuments. This legislative measure extended in later years, served as a basis for creating the National Technical Museum. This institution provided an answer to the over hundred-year old problem of research into scientific and technical history in Hungary. The law-decree, and the related collecting, organizing and research work required an unequivocal definition of the concept of industrial archeology and industrial monument: The experiences of England, the Federal Republic of Germany, the German Democratic Republic and Poland can serve as examples in this field but the specific aspects of Hungary's past (economic and social) must be taken into consideration. We can start from the definition that any object or creation documenting, resp. illustrating the history of human work and the evolution of creativity should be considered as item belonging to scientific or technical history. Polish scholars believe that the oldest monuments of technical history can be regarded also as the earliest documents of the working people's life, and so this type of research is closely connected with other branches of history. A separate question is what sorts of objects can be considered industrial monuments. Here we can accept K. Hudson's view that in the most up-to-date industries (e.g. electronics) a 10-20 year old object can be considered a monument, in relatively young sectors (oil industry) the monuments are 50-100 year-old objects, and in old branches of industry they are older than that. This opinion can be accepted with the addition that the economic and social development of a given country must be taken into consideration. The same object can be regarded an unimportant manufacture item in an industrially advanced country, and a significant monument of industrial history in a less developed one.
