Gáti Csilla (szerk.): A Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve 54., 2016-2017 (Pécs, 2017)
RÉGÉSZET - Viktor Wéber: Settlement of the Early Urnfield period at Majs–Borza-major (Southern Transdanubia, Hungary)
A Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve ( 2017 ) 200 faceted shoulders on amphorae can be found in the assemblage of Očkov, but faceted shoulders also appeared in assemblages of the Čaka culture, dated to the beginning of the Ha A1 period ( Paulík 1963: Obr. 11. 6., Obr. 12. 3–5.), at the cemetery of Baierdorf ( Lochner 1986: Taf. 6. 2.), and at the settlement of Oberbergern ( Lochner 1994: Taf. 19. 6.). Some of the sherds of faceted shoulders from Kalnik–Igrišče I. may also be reconstructed as amphorae ( Vrdoljak 1994: T. 26. 2., T. 30. 1–2.). One of the amphorae (Fig. 11/ 3) is decorated with horizontal channelling just below the rim and vertical channelling on its handle. Several examples of horizontal channelling below the rim are known 5 , but in every case the vessel bearing the decoration is of the later type with everted rim and conical neck, and the additional decoration comprises of vertical or vertical and horizontal channels on their bodies instead of horizontal faceting. 3. Bowls and cups 3.1. Bowls with inverted rims A total of 5 sherds of bowls with inverted rims have been found at Majs–Borzamajor, 2 of which are decorated with horizontal facets and 3 with oblique channels. 3.1.1. Bowls with inverted, horizontally faceted rims ?e appearance of inverted rims with horizontally faceted decoration (Fig. 12/ 1–2) seems to have taken place in the Initial Urnfield period and remained in use at least in some areas until the Late Urnfield period ( Kalicz-Schreiber et al. 2010: 253., Ilon 2015: 227.). It is considered to be a characteristic type in the Drava valley in the Ha C1 period ( Ilon et al. 2011: 150.). 6 3.1.2. Bowls with inverted, obliquely channelled rims ?e oblique channelled decoration on inverted rims (Fig. 12/ 3–5) appeared roughly simultaneously with horizontal faceting in the Initial and Early phase of the Urnfield period and remained in use for the rest of the period ( Patek 5 Chotín ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 9. A. 2., Obr. 12. B. 22, 31, 34.), Tököl ( Patek 1958: 12. kép 8., Říhovský 1966: Obr. 16. D. 3., Obr. 17. D. 3.), Domanyik ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 17. E. 1.), Kisszentmiklós ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 17. F. 1.), Érd ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 20. B. 8.), Esztergom ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 22. D. 1.), Szentendre–Szigetmonostor ( Patek 1968: Taf. CXXVI. 3., Taf. CXXVIII. 1.), Vál ( Patek 1968: Taf. CXX. 1, 9., Říhovský 1966: Obr. 18. G. 2, K. 3-5., Obr. 19. A. 20., Obr. 20. A. 3, 7.), Polgár M3-29 ( V. Szabó 2004: 8. kép 2.), Igrici ( V. Szabó 2004, 10. kép 5., 11. kép 1.) 6 Supported by their presence at Ormož ( Dular – Jevremov 2010: T. 6. 1., T. 12. 2., T 14. 3., T. 15. 15., T. 19. 7., T. 21. 4., T. 22. 8, 15., T. 23. 11., T. 37. 4., T. 45. 3, 6., T. 48. 11-12., T. 51. 3-4., T. 56. 5-6., T. 62. 7., T. 70. 6., T. 89. 5., T. 128. 18., T. 131. 14.), Kalnik–Igrišče II. ( Karavanić 2009: Pl. 23. 3, 5.), Ljubljana–SAZU courtyard ( Puš 1971: T. 43. 5., T. 47. 5., T. 52. 11.), or in the Dalj group ( Metzner-Nebelsick 2002: Taf. 30. 13., Taf. 42. 36., Taf. 50. 1,3.)
