Gáti Csilla (szerk.): A Janus Pannonius Múzeum Évkönyve 54., 2016-2017 (Pécs, 2017)
RÉGÉSZET - Viktor Wéber: Settlement of the Early Urnfield period at Majs–Borza-major (Southern Transdanubia, Hungary)
Settlement of the Early Urnfield period at Majs–Borza-major 201 1968: 102., Črešnar 2010: 22., 24., Gavranović 2011: 47., Ložnjak Dizdar – Gavranović 2014 : 22., Ilon 2015: 228.). According to M. Črešnar, oblique channelled decoration on rims from the Ha A phase tend to be flatter, wider, and sparser, while narrower, denser, and more upright decorations appeared only in the Ha B period with the continuous use of the earlier type ( Črešnar 2010: 24–25.). A later type of bowls with inverted rims with oblique channel was also distinguished by É. Vadász, which is narrower and usually appears on globular bowls, o?en making the rim of the vessel slightly wavy. She noted that some of the early examples of oblique channelling on inverted rims should correctly be regarded as obliquely faceted decoration. She also presumed that the proportion of vessels with inverted rims decorated with oblique channels was increasing during the Ha A, while the proportion of rims with facets was decreasing ( Vadász 1992: 218.). 3.2. Conical bowls and cups Amongst the conical bowls and cups that were present during the entire of the Urnfield period, E. Patek distinguished two main types, one characteristic in the Early, one in the Late Urnfield period. ?e conical bowls from Majs–Borzamajor (Fig. 13/ 1–3) are closer to the earlier type, namely to Patek’s 4th variant ( Patek 1968: 103–104., Taf. VII. 4.). É. Vadász noted that conical bowls and cups were common in the Baierdorf-Velatice phase and in the Lausitz culture, while they are usually not present at sites of the Čaka culture ( Vadász 1992: 220., 5. kép 2., 10. kép 1.). Although no conical bowls have been uncovered at the cemetery of Baierdorf, the slightly younger graves of Horn yielded several vessels belonging to this type ( Lochner 1991 b : Taf. 3. 7–8., Taf. 6. 4., Taf. 8. 11–12., Taf. 10. 20–22.). Two parallels are known from Baranya County, one from Mohács–Csele patak, dated to the Ha A period ( Patek 1968: 59–60., Taf. XCVI. 3.), and one from Pécsvárad–Aranyhegy ( Dombay 1958: t. XLII. 2.). Four parallels can be found in the vessel depot of Igrici, dated to the Ha A1 period ( V. Szabó 2004: 11. kép 34–37.) and one from the settlement of Kalnik, dated to the Bz D/Ha A1-Ha A2 period ( Vrdoljak 1994: T. 29. 1.). An o?en handleless, rounded variant is known from Brinjeva gora ( Oman 1981: T. 37. 11.), Kalnik–Igrišče II. ( Karavanić 2009: Pl. 12. 5.), and the Late Urnfield period cemetery of Budapest–Békásmegyer, where some variants are more rounded, even hemispherical ( Kalicz-Schreiber et al. 2010: Taf. 40. 3., Taf. 41. 8., Taf. 55. 4., Taf. 57. 6–7, 9., Taf. 60. 2–3., Taf. 67. 9., Taf. 68. 3–4., Taf. 69. 4., Taf. 79. 2., Taf. 104. 10., Taf. 169. 7., Taf. 170. 2., Taf. 172. 3., Taf. 174. 9., Taf. 177. 1., Taf. 189. 2.). One of the conical bowls from Majs shows a slight projection of the rim above its handle (Fig. 13/ 2), which was considered characteristic in the Podoli and Vál groups ( Říhovský 1966: Obr. 3. H 2., Obr. 4. F 1., Obr. 5. B 2 ., E s.n .,
