Fogorvosi szemle, 2020 (113. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2020-09-01 / 3. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE113. évf. 3. sz. 2020.n

95

based dental composites. Dent Mater 2019; 35: 477–485. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.005

24. SANANEZ A, SANCHEZ A, DAVIS L, VENTO Y, RUEGGEBERG F: Allergic reaction from dental bonding material through nitrile gloves: Clinical case study and glove permeability testing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12546

25. SCHMALZ G: Materials science: biological aspects. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 660–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208101001

26. SCHMALZ G, BINDSLEV DA: Biocompatibility of Dental Materials [Internet]. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009

27. SCHMALZ G, GALLER KM: Biocompatibility of biomaterials – Lessons learned and considerations for the design of novel materials. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental. 2017.01.011

28. SCHMALZ G, GRÖPPL F, HILLER K-A, GALLER KM: Three-Dimensional Human Cell Cultures for Cytotoxicity Testing of Dental Filling Materials. Acta Stomatol Croat 2014; 48: 99–108. https://doi.

org/10.15644/asc48/2.99

29. SCHMALZ G, HICKEL R, VAN LANDUYT KL, REICHL F-X: Nanoparticles in dentistry. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 1298–1314. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.dental.2017.08.193

30. SCHMALZ G, HICKEL R, VAN LANDUYT KL, REICHL F-X: Scientific update on nanoparticles in dentistry. Int Dent J 2018; 68: 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12394

31. SCHMALZ G, KRIFKA S, SCHWEIKL H: Toll-like receptors, LPS, and dental monomers. Adv Dent Res 2011; 23: 302–306. https://doi.

org/10.1177/0022034511405391

32. SCHMALZ G, SCHUSTER U, THONEMANN B, BARTH M, ESTERBAUER S: Dentin barrier test with transfected bovine pulp-derived cells. J Endod 2001; 27: 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770 -200102000-00009

33. SCHMALZ G, WIDBILLER M, GALLER KM: Material Tissue Interaction-From To-xicity to Tissue Regeneration. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 117–

131. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-249-BL

34. SCHWEIKL H, HARTMANN A, HILLER K-A, SPAGNUOLO G, BOLAY C, BROCKHOFF G, et al: Inhibition of TEGDMA and HEMA-induced genotoxicity and cell cycle arrest by N-acetylcysteine. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.021

35. SCHWEIKL H, SPAGNUOLO G, SCHMALZ G: Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 870–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501001

36. SPRANLEY TJ, WINKLER M, DAGATE J, ONCALE D, STROTHER E: Curing light burns. Gen Dent 2012; 60: e210–214.

37. TADIN A, MAROVIC D, GALIC N, KOVACIC I, ZELJEZIC D: Compositeinduced toxicity in human gingival and pulp fibroblast cells. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 304–311. https://doi.org/10.3109/ 00016357.2013.824607

38. TAUBÖCK TT, MAROVIC D, ZELJEZIC D, STEINGRUBER AD, ATTIN T, TARLE Z: Genotoxic potential of dental bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2017; 33: 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental. 2017.04.011

39. THARP AP, MAFFINI MV, HUNT PA, VANDEVOORT CA, SONNENSCHEIN C, SOTO AM: Bisphenol A alters the development of the rhesus monkey mammary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 8190–

8195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120488109

40. VAN LANDUYT KL, KRIFKA S, HILLER K-A, BOLAY C, WAHA C, VAN MEERBEEK B, et al: Evaluation of cell responses toward adhesives with different photoiniti-ating systems. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 916–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.016

41. VAN LANDUYT KL, NAWROT T, GEEBELEN B, DE MUNCK J, SNAUWAERT J, YOS-HIHARA K, et al: How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 723–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.001

42. WILLIAMS DF: On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 2941–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2008.04.023

43. XUE J, YANG B-N: [Effect of preheating on the properties of resin composite]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 37: 571–576.

BARNA BK, FRÁTER M

Resin based composite restorative materials and their effect on oral and general health

Literature review

In dentistry, more and more new materials are becoming commercially available to facilitate a more perfect healing activity. It has to be realized that beyond their restorative function in the tooth or in the oral cavity by themselves, these materials are also placed into a dinamically changing medium, thereby they interact not only with their direct environment, but with the whole organism. Keeping this in mind, it is mandatory to know not only about their properties and handling, but also their local and systematic effects in order to minimize or avoid the potential harmful impact on the tissues or on the whole body. The authors with this review would like to give an insight, a small guideline for the daily use of resin based materials, based on the international and Hungarian scientific literature data. The goal is, besides reinforcing our knowledge, to create a safer conditions and environment for the patient, the dentist, and the whole medical team during treatment for the patient, the dentist, and the whole medical team.

Keywords: biocompatibility, composite, monomer, resin

Review