Fogorvosi szemle, 2018 (111. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)
2018-06-01 / 2. szám
58 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 111. évf. 2. sz. 2018. 12. Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, Romanos GE: Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation, tnterv Med Appl Sei. 2013; 5 (4): 162-167. 13. Scharf DR, Tarnow DP: The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. J Periodontol. 1993; 64 (10): 954-956. 14. Mombelli A, van Oosten M A, Schurch E Jr, Land N P: The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987. 2, 2 (4): 145-151. 15. Klinge B, Meyle J: Peri-implant tissue destruction. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. din Oral Implants Res. 2012; 6: 108-110. 16. Heitz-Mayfield, LJ: Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 292-304. 17. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE: Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for Prevention and Management of Biologic and Technical Implant Complications. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 346-350. 18. Schwarz, MS: Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 1: 156-158. 19. Yerit KC et al: Implant survival in mandibles of irradiated oral cancer patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17 (3): 337-344. 20. Harrison JS, Strateman HS, Redding SW: Dental implants for patients who have had radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Special Care in Dentistry. 2003; 23 (6): 223-229. 21. Szigethy E et al: Epidemiology of the metabolic syndrome in Hungary. Public Health. 2012; 126 (2): 143-149. 22. Széles G et al: Establishment and preliminary evaluation of the General Practitioners’ Morbidity Sentinel Stations Program in Hungary. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and liver cirrhosis. Orv Hetit. 2003; 3; 144 (31): 1521-1529. 23. Tompa A: A daganatos betegségek előfordulása, a hazai és a nemzetközi helyzet ismertetése. Magy Tud. 2011 ; 11: 1333- 1344. 24. Madléna M, Hermann P, Jáhn M, Fejérdy P: Caries prevalence and tooth loss in Hungarian adult population: results of a national survey. Public Health. 2008; 8: 364. 25. Fábián T, Fejérdy P, Somogyi E: Evaluation of the dental status from he viewpoint of denture requirements in the adult population of Hungary. Fogorv Sz. 1998; 91,383-389; 91,383-389. 26. Bránemark R, Ohrnell LO, Skálák R, Carlsson L, Bránemark PI: Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res. 1998; 16 (1): 61-69. 27. Winter W, Klein D, Karl, M: Micromotion of Dental Implants: Basic Mechanical Considerations. J Med Eng. 2013. 28. Charalampakis G, Leonhardt A, Rabe P, Dahlen G: Clinical and microbiological characteristics of peri-implantitis cases: a retrospective multicentre study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 (9): 1045-1054. 29. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe L, Klinge B: Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol. 1995; 22 (3): 255-261. 30. Zitzmann, NU, Walter, C és Berglundh, T: Ätiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie der Periimplantitis - eine Übersicht. Dtsch Zahnarzt! Z. 2006; 61: 642-649. 31. Rams TE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ: Antibiotic resistance in human peri-implantitis microbiota. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 25: 82-90. 32. Salonen MA, Oikarinen K, Virtanen K, Pernu H: Failures in the Osseointegration of Endosseous Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8 (1): 92-97. Iványi D, KlVOVICS P Examination of dental implants removal The aim of this research is to make a comparative interpretation of implant removals in the last four years in the Department of Community Dentistry. The applied data were obtained by x-rays, medical charts and patient management program, called FOGÁSZ, found in the Department of Community Dentistry. Data were evaluated with Microsoft Excel software. The last four years, 30 patients’ 58 implants were removed in the Department of Community Dentistry. The average age was 64,3 (±8,8) years and 96,7% of the patients were aged 50 or over. 53,7% of the concerned individuals’ inserted implants were removed. 20,0% of the patients lost their implants within six months from surgery. The removed implants were possessed 5,8 (±4,3) for years on average. 36,7% of the patients had fixed prosthesis supported implant and teeth, this was the most common prosthesis type. The prevalence of peri-implantitis around removed implants was 77,6%. Out of the partly edentulous patients, horizontal bone resorption was discernible in 50,0%. 12,1% of the removals were recommended because of inflammation before osseointegration. It is recommended not to plan any prostheses anchored at the same time to tooth and implant. Fixed prostheses simultaneously anchored on both tooth and implant may cause implant loss, because biomechanical aspects of anchoring behave differently in the bone. Prevention of periimplantitis is a key factor in the success of implants, which can be achieved by proper oral hygiene. Periodontitis could also promote the development of peri-implantitis. Patients with periodontitis should be cured of inflammation before implantation. Important factor for osseointegration is the inflammation-free healing. Keywords: Dental implants, Periimplantitis, Implant complication, Implant removal, Implant failure
