Fogorvosi szemle, 2008 (101. évfolyam, 1-6. szám)
2008-12-01 / 6. szám
230 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 101. évf. 6. sz. 2008. • Szükséges lenne az extrakciós gyakoriság folyamatos felmérése és az adatok széles körű egyeztetése. • Ezáltal lehetőség nyílik bizonyítékon alapuló terápiás protokollok kidolgozására. Irodalom 1. Weintraub JA, Víg PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ: The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 462-466. 2. Angle EH: Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth and fractures of the maxilla, Angle’s system. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Dental Mfg. Co., 1907; 26-28, 197-206. 3. Begg PR: Stone age man’s dentition. Am J Orthod 1954; 40: 289- SI 2. 4. Tweed CH: Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedures. Am J Orthod 1944; 30: 405-427. 5. Peck S, Peck H: Frequency of tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1979; 76: 491-496. 6. Proffit WR: Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994; 64 (6): 407-414. 7. Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC: Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 324-331. 8. Bredy E, Erbring CH, Reichel I: Häufigkeit von Zahnextraktionen im Rahmen kieferorthopädischer Therapie. Stomatol DDR 1988; 38: 391-395. 9. Klock KS, Haugejorden O: Primary reasons for extractions of permanent teeth in Norway: changes from 1968 to 1988. Communtiy Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991 ; 19: 336-341. 10. McCaul LK, Jenkins WMM, Kay EJ: The reasons for the extraction of various tooth types in Scotland: a 15-year follow up. J Dent 2001; 29: 401^107. Dr. Somoskövi I, Dr. Herényi G, Dr. Szabó Gy. T, Dr. Gurdän Zs, Dr. Szabó Gy: Frequency of tooth removal because of orthodontic reasons In certain orthodontic treatments therapy includes the removal of permanent tooth or teeth. The number of objective studies on assessing extraction frequency is low and values in the international publications range between wide limits. This shows that often the extraction decision in the treatment planning does is not made upon the criteria of evidence-based dentistry. In our practice, a retrospective analysis of treatment plans prepared between the 1st of January 2004 and the 31th of December 2006 (416 cases) has been performed. The overall prevalence of treatments with extraction was 41,59% for all patients, the rate was 51,63% in patients with permanent dentition at the time of the planning. The highest proportion of extraction (49,71%) was found in Class II subdivision 2 cases, and the lowest percentage (30,17%) in Class I cases. The decision for extraction does not seem to be influenced by cephalometric analysis directly. The higher percentage of extraction found in permanent dentition period shows that when we cannot use interceptive treatment alternatives, we are forced to extract tooth more frequently. On the other hand, the lower value in early mixed dentition period can be explained by the relatively higher number of treatments with the aim to avoid extraction. Key words: orthodontic anomaly, extraction, frequency, treatment plan HIRDETÉS Eladó Budán az I. kerületben, az Attila úton egy 140 nm-es lakás újonnan berendezett fogorvosi rendelővel külön vagy együtt. Megtekintés után az ár megegyezés szerint alakul. Érdeklődés a 356-6309 számú budapesti telefonszámon az eseti órákban.
