Fogorvosi szemle, 2007 (100. évfolyam, 1-6. szám)
2007-10-01 / 5. szám
232 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE 100. évf. 5. sz. 2007. without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1693-1698. 130. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heul L, Bernimoulin JP: Comparative study of Emdogain® and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 35-41. 131 .Spahr A, Hägewald S,TsoulfidouF, Rompola E, Heul L, Bernimoulin JP, Ring C, Sander S, Haller B: Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally repositioned flap technique: a 2 year report. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 1871-1880. 132. Cueva MA, Boltchi FE, Hallmon WW, Nunn ME, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Rees T: A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 949-956. 133. Castellanos AT, de la Rosa MR, de la Garza M, Caffesse RG: Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 7-14. 134. McGuire MK, Nunn M: Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1 : Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 1110-1125. 135. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Moses O: A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 600-607. 136. Berlucchi I, Franchetti L, Del Fabro M, Testőri T, Weinstein RL: Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2002; 22: 583-593. 137. Del Pizzo M, Zucchelli G, Modica F, Villa R, Debernardi C: Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2 year study. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 11 SI- 1187. 138. Ofer M, Artzi Z, Sculean A, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Romanos GE, Nemcovsky CE: Comparative study of 2 root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 195- 202. 139. Jepsen S, Heinz B, Jepsen K, Arjomand M, Hoffmann T, Richter S, Reich E, Sculean A, Gonzalez JR, Bodeker RH, Meyle J: A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal Class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part I: study design and results for primary outcomes. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1150-1160. 140. Meyle J, Gonzalez JR, Bodeker RH, Hoffmann T, Richter S, Heinz B, Arjomand M, Reich E, Sculean A, Jepsen K, Jepsen S: A randomized clinical trial comparing enamel matrix derivative and membrane treatment of buccal class II furcation involvement in mandibular molars. Part II: secondary outcomes. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1188-1195.