Dr. T. Tóth szerk.: Studia historico-anthropologica (Anthropologia Hungarica 13. Budapest, 1974)

Between Duna and Tisza: Aldebrő-Mocsáros X-XI. c. (MARCSIK, 1967), Cegléd XI-XII.c. (LIPTÁK, 1957), Csatalja XI.c. (LIPTÁK, 1957J, Csongrád-Felgyő XI-XVI. c. (BARTUCZ-PARKAS, 1956), Jászdózsa XI-XIV. c. (LIPTÁK, 1957), Kál X.c. (ÉRY, 1970), Szatymaz X-XII.c. (LIPTÁK-FARKAS, 1967), Tiszavárkony VII-IX.c. (LIPTÁK, 1957). Beyond the Tisza: Békés-Povádzug X-XII.c.(LIPTÁK-FARKAS, 1967), Kardoskút-Fehértó XI-XII. c. (MARCSIK, 1970), Orosháza-Rákóczitelep X-XII.c. (LIPTÁK-FARKAS, 1962), Téglás-Angolkert XI-XIV. c. (LIPTÁK-MARCSIK, 1965), Tiszaderzs VI-IX. c. (LEBZELTER, 1957), Tiszavasvári VII. c. (

WENGER, 1972a, b), Szentes-Kaján VII-VIII. c. (

WENGER, 1955). In case of the Transdanubian populations at Sopronbánfalva some similarity was found as regards types, but the metric data were different both in males and in females. No similarity was found with any other Transdanubian series either. On basis of both the metric data and the types a great similarity is shown with the series found at Jászdózsa. There is an express similarity in the males, a lesser rate in the females. In case of the females a rather good similarity can be seen with the Szatymaz series on basis of both the metric and the type analysis. The measurements and the indices of the males at Orosháza are close to those at Tiszalök, though at Tiszalök bigger values were found for measurements 1., 8., 17., 47. A bigger rata of differences can be found in females. This statement is corroborated by type analysis too. Again similarity is shown with Békés-Povádzug,in a more express from in males than in females. A lesser similarity can be stated with the Téglás-Angolkert series. This similarity is more express in the female series. It is to be noted that this similarity is shown with the material