Ardelean, Gavril (szerk.): Satu Mare. Studii şi comunicări. Seria ştiinţele naturale 6. (2005)

Secţiunea medicină şi management

Satu Mare - Studii şi Comunicări Ştiinţele Naturale — Voi. VI (2005)

screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96(20): 1518-27

9. Gokalp G, Topái U. AÍR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57(3): 436-44

10. Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Ljung BM, Grady D. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139(4): 274-84

11. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ et al . Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nortpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncolog) Croup V Study. Acad Radiol 2004; ll(3):293-308

12. Chuo CB, Corder AP. Core biopsy vs fine needle aspiration cytology in a symptomatic breast clinic. Eur J Oncol 2003; 29(4):374-8

13. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J et al. Mammographie features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, menopause status. J Nad Cancer Inst 1995; 87(21): 1622-9

14. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of intemal-and screen-detected cancers. J Nad Cancer Inst 2000; 92(13):1081- 7

15. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E. Diagnostic peformance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(17): 1773-83

16. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F et al. Breast lesions detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and fullfield digital mammography with soft-copy readingobserver peformance study. Radiology 2005; 237(l):37-44

17. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181(1): 177-82

18. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancer, the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180(6): 1675-9

19. Nakamura S. Breast MRl-principal role and future perpectives. Nippon Rinsho 2006; 64(3): 497-503

20. Hussain R, Buscombe JR. A meta-analysis of stintimammography: an evidence-based approach to its clinical utility. Nucl Med Commun 2006; 27(7): 589-94

21. CorsettiV, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast cartinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006; 111(3): 440-8

22. Nagashima T, Hashimoto H, Oshida K. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalffications in patients with dudál

cartinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer 2005; 12(3): 216-20

23. AI Sarakbi W, Salhab M, Mokbel K. Does mammary ductoscopy have a role in clinicalpracticei Int Semin Surg Oncol 2006; 3(1): 16

24. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill K et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292(11): 1317-25

25. Ágnese DM. Advances in breast imaging. Surg Technolint 2005; 14:51-6

26. Jaukovic LDj, Ajdinovic BZ, Jankovic ZD, Strbac M. Technetium-99m-tetrofosmin in diagnosis of breast cancer and axillary lymph node involvement. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 2004; 7(2): 151-5

365