Zs. P. Komáromy szerk.: Studia Botanica Hungarica 13. 1979 (Budapest, 1979)

Németh, Ferenc: The vascular flora and vegetation on the Szabadszállás-Fülöpszállás territory of the Kiskunság National Park (KNP), I.

Poa angustifolia L. : fr. annua L. : n. fr. bulbosa L. ssp. pseudoconcinna (SCHUR) DOSTAL: com. compressa L. : fr. palustris L. : n. fr. C pratensis L. : fr. C triviális L. : fr. C Potamogeton na tans L. : com. C, 9181da, 9281ba pectinatus L. : fr. PuccineHia distans (L. ) PARL. : com. lim osa (SCHUR) HOLMBG. : com. peisonis (BECK. ) JÁV. : n. fr. Schoenoplectus lacustris (L. ) PALLA: r. Tabernaemontani (GMEL. ) PALLA: com. Schoenus nigricans L. : fr. 9281af, ag Sclerochloa dura (L. ) P. B. : r. Setaria italica (L. ) R. et SCH. : loc. 9280aj lutescens (WE

IGEL) HUBBARD: com. Spiranthes spiralis (L. ) CHEVALL: loc. 9181dbJD Spirodela polyrrhiza (L. ) SCHLEID. : fr. 9181fb, gb Stipa capillata L. : loc. 9181iaHJ, 9281eaAA Tragus racemosus (L. ) ALL. : fr. 9280aj, bj, cj, dj Triglochin maritima L. : fr. 9181dc, ec, fd, gd, hd, he, je, 9281ab, ac Typha angustifolia L. : fr. lati folia L. : r. C Laxmannii LE PECH. : fr. Typhoides arundinacea (L. ) DUM. : loc. 9281abFC, abGC, abHC, r. C Zannichellia palustris L. : fr. ssp. pedicellata (WAHLENB

. et ROSÉN) HEGI: r. var. aculeata (SCHUR) A. et G. : r. PHY TOGEOGRAPHICAL SPECTRUM - In order to analyze the phytogeographical character of the area, we need to make a comparison with the geobotanical distribution of the Hungarian flora. The employed data are taken from SOÓ 1964, MEUSEL 1967 and HULTÉN 1964. Of course, this comparison would be more effective considering the correlations between the geobotanical, coenological and ecological characters of species, but it would be beyond the range of this work. The percentile distribution of phytogeographical elements of the Szabadszállás and Hungarian floras are represented in Tables 1 and 2. The right marginal values are showing the influence of different geobotanical elements in percent, in totality the phytogeographical character of the flora. (The sum of these values because of their overlap is more than 100.) Also the total number of investigated species is given. The differences between the flora are shown in Fig. 1. The ratio of these values of geobotanical influence in each category between flora, are presented in Table 3. These quotients express the relative impoverishment (if they are less than 1) or richness (being more than 1) of the Szabadszállás flora in certain categories. Because of some sys-