Dr. Murai Éva - Gubányi András szerk.: Parasitologia Hungarica 29-30. (Budapest, 1997)

üli instar» IMV instar» Fig. 4. Residual efficacy of BIOPREN BM 5 GR (5% methoprene) against Aedes cantons larvae in semi-field test (Reduction rate > 90%; Concentration: BIOPREN BM 5 GR 0.5 ppm, ALTOSID 1 ppm; Tested individuals: 60 larvae per trial) Day* ot blotait after trHtnwnt Fig. 6. Residual efficacy of BIOPREN BM 5 GR on larvae of Musca domestica "dry treatment" (Formulation type: BIOPREN BM 5 GR = 5 % methoprene) 1 2 3 4 5 B 7 Time of counting (weeki) BIOPREN BM S GR BIOPREN BM 5 GR + PROTECT B fly killer Control 0 7 14 21 28 Age of test solution (days) Fig. 5. Residual efficacy of BIOPREN BM 5 GR (5% methoprene) against L3 instar larvae of Aedes aegypti (Concentration: 2 ppm = 0.1 g/

50 land 10ppm = 0.5 g/50 1 water; Survival :fly

ing adults in percentageof added larvae) Days of blotest after traatnwnt Fig. 7. Residual efficacy of BIOPREN BM 5 GR on larvae of Musca domestica -"wet treatment" (Formulation type: BIOPREN BM 5 GR = 5 % methoprene) Time of counting (week) Caned BIOPREM BU 5 GR » PROTECT B By kltor 1 BIOPREN BM 5 OR Fig. 8. Fly infestation of pig-rearing rooms of battery cage management Fig. 9. Fly infestation of piglets