Szekessy Vilmos (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 57. (Budapest 1965)

Móczár, L.: Remarks of some types of Drynini and Gonatopodini (Hymenoptera)

lary palpi with four segments according to RICHARDS — and five (2+3) on neotype (Fig. 48). Three segments can be distinctly recognized apically, beyond angle of palpi; enlarged claw with a ... five or six peg-like structures on neotype with 7 — (Fig. 47), on other specimens, with 6 — according to KIEFFER'S description with 6—8 lamellae; englarged claw a little longer and broader (Fig. 47) than on Fig. 17, as given by RICHARDS; posterior side of ocellar triangle only approximately half as long as two other sides (4 : 7, 100 X

, meassuring from margins of ocelli) ; according to RICHARDS; „Pronotum . . . one and half times as long as broad" on neotype length: breadth = 22 : 17. Prof.RICHARDS had kindly compared these two specimens with his English exemplars and completed the list of differences by the following remarks: („your specimens") „have almost no transverse furrow on the pronotum, whereas mine have a well marked one. The pegs on the large claw are more lamella-like in your species, more peg-like in mine. In your species the propodeum is stouter and less hairy . . . Plectrogonatopus is bred from Jassids." Although some of the above differences are rather fine and hardly discernible (I, too, have seen English specimens), the very difference in the number of segments of the maxillary palpi precludes the identification of the specimens under consideration as striatus KIEFFER. Hence I propose that the specimens Plectrçgonatopus striatus KIEFFER sensu RICHARDS be separated under th^ name Plectrogonatopus richardsi spec.n., from the species Gonatopus striatus KIEFFER. RICHARDS' description (loc.cit.) will define it and the holotype is a female in the collection of the British Museum; Kent East Deal, 12. June 1912, DONISTHORPE Collection. The left foreleg and the mouthparts are mounted on celluloid on the same pin as the specimen. Pseudogonatopus PERKINS Pseudogonatopus PERKINS, 1905, Rep. exp. Stat. Hawaii, Eni. 1, p. 34 Pseudogonatopus: 1907, KIEFFER, Gen. Insect., 54, p. 16 Pseudogonatopus : 1914, KIEFFER, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 79 $ ~* Pseudogonatopus: 1939, RICHARDS, Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 89, p. 195, 205 Pseudogonatopus: 1957, BOUCEK, Klíö zvífeny CSR. 2, p. 333 The diagnosis of this genus is given earlier in the key before. Pseudogonatopus distinctus (KIEFFER) Gonatopus distinctus KIEFFER, 1906, Spec. Hym., 9, p. 509 Q Gonatopus distinctus: 1907, KIEFFER, Gen, Insect,, 54, p. 21 Dicondylus distinctus: 1914, KIEFFER, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 75 Goniosus septemdentatus S

kHhHERG, 1910 according to Hellén, 1919, Meddel. Soc, Faun. Flora Fenn. p. 288 Gonatopus (Dicondylus) distinctus: 1919, HELLÉN, 1. c, p. 288 9 Dicondylus distinctus: 1932, PICARD, Bull. Soc. ent, France, 37, p. 29 Pseudogonatopus distinctus: 1939, RICHARDS, Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 89, p. 205 9 Fig. 10-11 Pseudogonatopus distinctus: 1948, RICHARDS, Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 23. p. 1 4 rf Gonatopus (Dicondylus) distinctus: 1953, HELLÉN, Notul. Ent., 33, p. 92 Pseudogonatopus distinctus: 1957, BOUCEK, Klíö zvífeny CSR., 2, p. 333 9 According to KIEFFER: „Patrie. Angleterre. Nous avons trouvé cet insecte dans la collection de MARSHALL, ou il figurait, en société de G. distinguendus et de G.