Szekessy Vilmos (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 57. (Budapest 1965)

Móczár, L.: Remarks of some types of Drynini and Gonatopodini (Hymenoptera)

the enlarged parts of segmnent 5, the border between them being indistinct. „Distalende ( = mediales Scherenglied) . . . mit 2 langen Lamellen . . . laterales Scherenghed . . . distal ohne Zahn" incorrect, really with four nearly equal lamellae and with a preapical tooth immediately below top. The following characters as given by RICHARDS (1939 p. 196) for Trigonatopus, originate very probably from KIEFFER, and need, on this account, the above mentioned corrections: „. . . pronotum transversely impressed, . . . enlarged claw ... no preapical tooth". The following additions to the description may be made: Frons not excavated but lying deeper than level of eyes, thus not „Front et vertex plans" as given by KIEFFER (1906 p. 51), its surface slightly concave, alutaceous, hardly shining, with a trace of a longitudinal keel sinking into a slight furrow before clypeus. Head slightly broadened behind eyes and emarginat edposteriorly. Genae strongly thickened. POL : OOL = 7 : 15 (100x). Ocelli forming a slightly acute angle. Mandibles with four teeth (Fig. 27). Maxillary palpi and labial palpi with 2 segments (Fig. 32). Scape : segment 1— 10 of antennae = 6:4:8:5:5:5:5: 4.5 : 4 : 5 : 9. Pronotum smooth, brillant, frontally in middle very slightly alutaceous without punctures or furrow and as broad as long. Mesonotum quadrate, length and breadth — 6.5 : 7, black margined on both sides, surface slightly shining and alutaceous. Border of scutellum delimited posteriorly by a slight distinct keel, surface shining, slightly alutaceous. Metanotum lying deeper than scutellum, very slightly rising toward propodeum, slightly rugose. Propodeum slightly shining, alutaceous between spiracles, posterior part distinctly transversally wrinkled. Sides of scutellum+propodeum divering to a small degree forwards, breadth in front: on propodeum = 15 : 13; Pronotum : mesonotum : scutellum : metanotum-)-propodeum = 17 : 6.5 : 3 : 22. Length: breadth of fore trochanter = 13:4. Fore metatarsus (Fig. 30): segment 2—5; enlarged claw = 11 : 2.5 : 3.5 : 8 : 13 : 11. Tibial spurs 1,1,1. Fore femur proximally, (Fig. 28), fore tibia distally, thickened (Fig. 29). Dicondylus (HALIDAY in CURTIS) Dicondylus HALIDAY in CURTIS, 1829 — 30, Guide to British Insects. 45. Dicondylus: 1907 KIEFFER, Gen. Insect., 54, p. 22 Laberius KIEFFER, 1914, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 59 Dicondylus: 1914, KIEFFER, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 72 Gonatopus (Dicondylus) subgenus: 1919, HELLÉN, Meddel. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn., p. 287 Dicondylus: 1928, BERLAND, Faune de France, 19, p. 146 Dicondylus: 1935, RICHARDS, Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 83, p. 147 Laberius: 1936, RICHARDS, Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B), 5, p. 169 Dicondylus: 1937, RICHARDS, Gen. Names Brit. Hym. Acul., p. 118 Dicondylus: 1938, HAUPT, Zeitschr. f. Naturw. Halle, 92, p. 19 9 rf Dicondylus: 1939, RICHARDS, Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 89, p. 195, 203, 226 9 d* Dicondylus: 1957, BOUCEK, Klíc, zvifeny CSR, 2, p. 333 The diagnosis of this genus is given in key above. Dicondylus bicolor (HALIDAY in CURTIS) Dryinus bicolor H ALIO AY in CURTIS, 1828, Brit. Ent., 5, no. 206 9 Gonatopus bicolor: 1905, KIEFFER, Spec. Hym., 9,108 Q PI. IV fig. 7; 1906, KIEFFER, 1. c, p. 500, 502, 508 9 Gonatopus (Dicondylus) bicolor: 1907, KIEFFER, Gen. Insect., 54, p. 22 PL 1. Fig. 16 Dicondylus bicolor: 1914, KIEFFER, Das Tierreich, 41, p. 73 Ç Gonatopus (Dicondylus) bicolor: 1919, HELLÉN, Meddel. SOC, Fauna Flora Fenn., p. 288 9