Szekessy Vilmos (szerk.): A Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum évkönyve 56. (Budapest 1964)

Rásky, K.: Studies of Tertiary plant remains from Hungary

References: 1. ARNOLD, C. A.: Fossil Osmundaceae from the Eocene of Oregon (Palaeontogr., 92, B, 1952, p. 63—78). — 2. ANDREWS, H. N.: Studies in paleobotany (New York and London, 1961). — 3. AXELROD, D. L: The evolution of flowering plants (Evo„ Darwin, 1, 1960, p. 227—305). — 4. AXELROD, D. I.: Fossil floras suggest stable, not drifting, continents (J. Geoph. Res, 68, 1963 p. 3257—3263). — 5. CHANEY, W. R. & AXELROD, D. I.: Miocene floras of the Columbia Plateau (Carn. Inst. Wash. Publ., 617, 1959, pp. 229). — 6. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: The Oligocène flora of the Bovey Tracey Lake Basin, Devonshire (Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol., 3, 1957, p. 73—123). — 7. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: Plant remains of the Hengistbury and Barton Beds (1. c, 4, 1960, p. 193—238). — 8. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: Flora of the Lower Headon Beds of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight (1. c., 5, 1961, p. 93—157). — 9. CHANDLER, M. E. J. : Revision of the Oligocène floras of the Isle of Wight (t. c, 6, 1963, p. 323—383). — 10. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: The Lower Tertiary floras of southern England I. Palaeocene floras. London Clay flora. Supplement (Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist., London, 1961, pp. 354, with atlas). — 11. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: The Lower Tertiary floras of southern England II. Flora of the Pipe-Clay series of Dorset (Lower Bagshot) (1. c, 1962, pp. 176). — 12. CHANDLER, M. E. J.: The Lower Tertiary floras of southern England III. Flora of the Bournemouth Beds. Boscombe and the Highcliff sands (1. c, 1963, pp. 163). —• 13. CROIZAT, L.: Manual of Phytogeography (The Hague, 1952). — 14. CROIZAT, L.: Panbiogeography I

—II (Caracas, 1958). — 15. CZECZOTT, H. : The Middle

—Miocene flora of Zalesce near Wisniowiec (Volhynia) I (Acta Geol. Polonica, 2, 1951, p. 349— 445). — 16, CZECZOTT, H.: The flora of the Baltic Amber and its age (Prace Muz. Ziemi, 4, 1963. p. 119— 145). — 17. DARRAH, C. W.: Principles of Paleobotany (New York, 1960, pp. 295). — 18. DEPAPE, G.: Les orientations actuelles des recherches paléobotaniques (Ann. Soc. Géol. du Nord, 67, 1957, p. 12—38). — 19. DEPAPE, G. & GRANGEON, P.: Les flores Miocènes de la France (83° Congr. Soc. sav., 1958, p. 153—170). — 20. DEPAPE, G.: Les flores fossiles du Crétacé Supérieur en France (84

E Congr. Soc. sav., Dijon, 1959, p. 61—94). — 21. DORF, E.

: Plants and the Geologic Time Scale (Crust of the Earth, Spec. Paper 62, 1955, p. 575— 592). — 22. FIORE, M. : Il genere Latanites Mass. illustrazione dialcune paime fossili del paleogene Veneto (Bull. Orto Bot. Napoli, 10, 1932, p. 123—153). — 23. FLORIN, R. : The distribution of Conifer and taxad genera in time and space (Acta Horti Berg., 20, 1963, p. 122—312). — 24. GIVULESCU, R.: Die fossile Flora Valea Neagra, Rumänien (Palaeontogr., 110, B, 1962, p. 128—187). — 25. GOOD, R.: The geography of flowering plants (London

—New York

—Toronto, 1947). — 26. GOTHAN, W. & WEYLAND, H. : Lehrbuch der Paläobotanik (Berlin, 1954). — 27. GRAMBAST L.: Flore de l'oligocène supérieur du Bassin de Paris (Ann. Paléont., Paris, 48, 1962, p. 80—85). — 28. GRANGEON, P.: Contribution a l'étude de la paléontologie végétale du Massif du Coiron (Ardéche) (Mém. Soc. Hist. Nat. Auvergne, 6, 1958, pp. 301). — 29. GREGUSS, P.: Az ipolytarnóc! alsó-miocén kövesedett famaradványok. — Les vestiges des bois silicifié du Miocène inférieur d'Ipolytarnóc (Bull. Hung. Geol. Soc, 84, 1954, p. 91—110). — 30. GREGUSS, P.: Urpflanzenreste aus dem Oligozän des Darnó—

Berges (Kom. Heves) (Bull. Hung. Geol. Soc, 86, 1956, p. 86—92). — 31. HANSEN, H. MOLHOLM: Life forms as age indicators (Copenhagen, 1956, pp. 50.) — 32. LIARRIS, T. M.: The origin of angiosperms (Adv. Sei., 17, 1960, p. 207—213). —33. HEER, O.: Miocene baltische Flora (Könisgberg, 1896). — 34. HEWITSON, W. : Comparative morphology of the Osmundaceae (Ann. Bot. Garden, 49, 1962, p. 57—93). — 35. HILTERMANN, H. : Fortschritte der Mikropaläontologie in Deutschland mit einer Bibliographie für das Jahr 1962 (Paläont. Zschr., 37, 1963, p. 239—267).—36. FIOEG, O. A. : The present and past vegetation of Spitsbergen (Proc, Linn. Soc, London, Sess., 166, 1953—54, p. 144—149). — 37. HUGHES, N. F.: Fossil evidence and angiosperm ancestry (Sei. Prog., 48, 1961, p. 84—102). — 38. ILJINSKAJA, I. A.: The fossil flora of the Mountain Kiin

—Kerish Zaisan Basin, II (Palaeobot., 4, 1963, p. 141—187). —• 39. JABLONSZKY, J.: Über die mediterrane Flora von Tarnóc (Jb. ungar. Geol. Anst., 22, 1914, p. 229—273). — 40. JONGMANS, W. & DIJKSTRA, S. J.: Filicales, Pteridospermae, Cycadales (Foss. Cat. II, Pars 49 [22], 1962, p. 2024—2042). — 41. KALELA, A.: A general review of the classification of vegetation especially with reference to forest vegetation and to regional problems (Internat. Soc. Trop. Ecol., 1, 1960, p. 12—27.) — 42. KAUL, K. N.: The anatomy of the stem of palms and the problem of the artificial genus Palmoxylon Schenk (Bull. Nat. Bot. Gardens, Lucknow, 51, 1960, p. 1—52). — 43.