SZ. BURGER ALICE: LATE ROMAN MONEY CIRCULATION IN SOUTH-PANNONIA / Régészeti Füzetek II/22. (Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum Budapest, 1981
THE STUDY OF MONEY CIRCULATION OF DIFFERENT SITESIN SOUTH-PANNONIA
The distribution of the mints of ROM and SIS is similar at the different sites. The products of the mints of AQU and THE have also a similar distribution, but the two pairs of mints differ from each other quite considerably (Study of Mints and Sites, cf. p. 14-16.) The distribution according to Emperors at the sites that can be best compared is similar in the case of the territory of Pannónia Prima, Valeria and the Barbaricum (Emperors - Study of Sites, cf. p. 17-19.) The Emperors used the mints of AQU - CON and those of ROM - THE in a similar manner (Mints - Study of Emperors, cf. p. 20-21.) On the basis of the coins found at the individual sites, C.Gallus and Gratian similarly utilized the mints (Study of Mints and Emperors, cf. p. 20-21.). In the period of PHASE A (coins from 324 to 36 4 ) MERNYE is the closest among the closed finds to the material of the cemeteries of SOPIANAE (Pécs) and TRICCIANA (Ságvár), and to the material of the graves of Baranya - Tolna - Somogy counties (Gr/1.) and of MAJS, SOMOGYSZIL, SOMODOR (Cemet. ) (Study of Sites and Years, cf. p. 22-23.)' There is a similarity in the study of the yearly distribution of monetary circulation between PHASE A until the coins of Constantius II and PHASE B until Valentinian I and Valens (A.D. 346-367) (Study of Emperors and Years, cf. p. 24-25.) DIFFERENCES The mints are represented in the most diverse manner in: Closed finds of MERNYE - ARPAS Graves of VAS-pta - Baranya - Tolna - Somogy counties (GR/l) (Study of Mints and Sites, cf. p. 14-16.) The coins of PERBÁL and ÁCS - VAS-pta differ from all others from the point of the distribution of Emperors in the sites. The coins of C.Gallus differ from all the rest (ÁCS - PERBÁL cf. p. 14-16.) The coins of ÁCS and PERBÁL differ from all the rest from the point of timewise distribution (Study of Sites and Years, cf. p. 22-23.) 48