Notitia hungáriae novae historico geographica (Budapest, 2012)

Sopron vármegye

INTRODUCTION

41

but we thouroughly checked it and when it was necessary, corrected it. When preparing the explanatory notes we used and many times refined Katalin Kincses’s notes, also we considered her indexes when preparing ours. On the whole we can say that although the previous edition contains a trustworthy text, we corrected it at many places in the present one (partly based on manuscript M), we published the supplements of manuscript M, furthermore we augmented and corrected considerably the note material.

V. Summary

Data providers: János Matolai (A); unknown (D, [Ru]); unknown (H); Dániel Haynóczi ([Ha]), János Kristóf Ruisz (?),63 János Kristóf Deccard (?, K)

Revisions by: county assembly ([Com]1, [Com]b); Chancellary ([Cane])

The manuscripts to publish: G, K, M

Translation: Bél 2001-2006.; Skoviera-Juríková 2010. 149-161. (Latin and Slovakian; excerpt)

Literature: Kincses 2001; Tóth 2001; Tóth 2006b; Sipekiová 2010.

63 See chapter 2 on the text genealogy of the county description.