Braun Tibor, Schubert András (szerk.): Szakértői bírálat (peer review) a tudományos kutatásban : Válogatott tanulmányok a téma szakirodalmából (A MTAK Informatikai És Tudományelemzési Sorozata 7., 1993)

Tartalomjegyzék Előszó 3 EUGENE GARFIELD: Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 1. Opinion and Conjecture on the Effectiveness of Refereeing 5 EUGENE GARFIELD: Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 2. The Research on Refereeing and Alternatives in the Present System 15 EUGENE GARFIELD: Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 3. How the Peer Review of Research-Grant Proposals Works and What Scientists Say About It 25 EUGENE GARFIELD: Refereeing and Peer Review. Part 4. Research on the Peer Review of Grant Proposals and Suggestions for Improvement 31 DOMENIC V. CLCCHETTI: The Reliability of Peer Review for Manuscript and Grant Submissions: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation 39 IAN I. MITROFF and DARYL E. CHUBIN: Peer Review at the NSF: A Dialectical Policy Analysis 107 RUSTUM ROY: Alternatives to Review by Peers: A Contribution to the Theory of Scientific Choice 141 ALAN L. PORTER and FREDERICK A. ROSSINI: Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals 155 ANGELO S. DENISI, W. ALAN RANDOLPH and ALLYN G. BLENCOE: Potential Problems with Peer Ratings 161 MARTIN RUDERFER: The Fallacy of Peer Review: Judgement without Science and a Case History 169 (A cikkek reprint formában való közzététele a copyright tulajdonosok írásos engedélyével történt.)