Istvánovits Eszter (szerk.): A nyíregyházi Jósa András Múzeum Évkönyve 57. (Nyíregyháza, 2015)
Régészet - Kőrösfői Zsolt: Hogyan is nevezzelek? Az erdélyi késő császárkori leletek értelmezési módjai a román régészetben
Körösfoi Zsolt Protase 1995. Dumitru Protase: Considérations sur l’urbanisme romain en Dacie et sur son sort au cours de la période de transition au féodalisme. Orizonturi daco-romane. Editura Carpatica, Cluj- Napoca 1995. Székely 1969. Zoltán Székely: Materiale ale culturii Säntana de Mure$-Cerneahov din sud-estul Transilvaniei. Aluta 1. 1969. 7-115. Székely 1976. Zoltán Székely: A§ezarea prefeudalá de la Bezid. (jud. Mure§). [Die vorfeudale Ansiedlung von Bezid (Kreis Mure§).] Marisia VI. 1976. 117-123. Vlassa 1962. Nicolae Vlassa: Uncimitir de incinerate de la sfTr§itul veacului III, de lalernut. [Могильник с трупосожжением конца III века в Иернуте. Cimetiére á incinération de Iemut de la fin du Ille siécle.] SCIVXWV. 1. 1962. 153-156. Vlassa 1965. Nicolae Vlassa: О pätrundere din vest a dacilor pe teritoriul fostei provincii Daciei in secolul al IV-lea e.n. (Descoperirile de la Cipäu-„Girle”). [Проникновение с запада даков на территорию бывшей провинции Дакии в IV в н.э. (Открытия в Чипэу-„Гырле”). Une pénétration de l’ouest des daces sur le territoire de 1’ ancienne province de Dacie au IVe siécle de notre éré (les découvertes de Cipäu-„Girle”).] SCIV 16: 3—4. 1965. 501-518. Vlassa-R usu-Protase-H oredt 1966. Nicolae Vlassa - Mircea Rusu - Dumitru Protase - Kurt Horedt: Säpäturile arheologic de la Iemut. [Archäologische Ausgrabungen bei Iernut, Rayon Ludu§.] ActaMN III. 1966. 399-410. Körösfői Zsolt Jósa András Múzeum H^4401 Nyíregyháza Pf. 57 e-mail: korosfoi@gmail.com How should I call you? Ways of interpretation of Transylvanian Late Roman Age finds in the Romanian archaeology After the surrender of province Dacia by Romans, the territory was occupied by the population of the Marosszentanna/Säntana de Mure§-Chemyahov Culture. History textbooks in a didactic way sharply divide historic peoples and periods following each other. Opposite of it, archaeological finds attest more to transitional periods between different periods and to peoples living side by side. Though archaeology is not able to give clear answers - that is why we have so many different interpretations -, we can certainly state that the new culture (Gothic tribal alliance known from historical sources) arrived to a territory that was not empty either from demographic, or from cultural point of view. Goths achieved their top power in the 4th century being the determining political force of the region. They did not disappear without any traces at the end of the century. 146
