Fülöp Éva – Cseh Julianna szerk.: „Die aktuellen Fragen des Mittelpaläolithikums in Mitteleuropa”. „Topical issues of the research of Middle Palaeolithic period in Central Europe”. Tata, 20-23 October 2003. (Tudományos Füzetek 12. Tata, 2004)

Árpád Ringer–Marie-Hélene Moncer: The Taubachian from Diósgyőr-Tapolca cave (Hungary)

Tool types fragment - ordinary Retouch on a whole edge - bifacial retouches - abrupt and denticulate Retouches Backed flake - Notche Back-platform flake — crushed edge - lateral notche Large and thick flake - bifacial Retouch - lateral denticulate abrupt retouches + crushed edge on the opposite face + retouches - Transversal ordinary inverse retouch Pointed flake - Flat inverse retouch - Abrupt inverse denticulate - convergent bifacial retouches Thin flake - crushed edge Table 9: Tool types from the level 5 (trench II) - A reduce shaping system The assemblages have yielded some bifacial tools (50-80 mm long), only on the most frequent raw materials, the quartzporphyres and the porphyrites. Most of them are partial and frequently on plate flint stone. The more or less invasive shaping is linked to the block shape: no-symetric section and independent shaping of each tool face. Some small removals are closely located and could be evidence of functional areas. The edges are very crsushed, as for the flake tools. The eemian industry from Diósgyőr-Tapolca cave (Hungary) In the state of knowledge, three kind of lithic industries have been identified in Hungary.

13 One of them yielded bifacial tools, in particular "pointes foliacées", belonging to the Jankovician type or the Babonyian type (Remete Felső cave, Kecskésgalya cave, Méhész-tető, for example). The Subalyuk cave levels, in the Bükk mountain, belong to a second group with several layers with Typical Mousterian rich in side-scrapers and one layer with a Mousterian type Quina.

14 The sequence dates from the OIS 5d and 4. There is the same type of assemblage in the Büdös-pest cave (Kecskésgalya) or 13 DOBOSI 2000. 14 MESTER 1989. 168