Cseh János: Régészeti tanulmányok a Közép - Tisza-vidékről (Tiszai téka 4-5. Szolnok, 1993)

a few, two-three places I gathered archeological finds, potsherds. Since records had not been made, in this manner today, more than years after it is very difficult to delimit, i.e. „to back-identify" these points somehow or other too. One thing is certain, that there are some talk of the two reaches of the southern side of the Tisza-bed. The one of them to be found on the outskirts of the village, in the area of the old loam-pit respectively of the sun-dried-brick-throwing, by the New Graveyard. This is the environs of the excavations of Amália Mozsolics (in the year 1957) and of Zsolt Csalog (1959 — Csöbörérpart, the No. 1—2. site of early migration age in the Gepidic settlement-topography of Kengyel from the years 1983—1984, as well as with the numeral 1 marked point among the sites of the Roman imperial, Sarmatic age — 1983—1985). Another, which is of more account on the basis of a some considerations, the part of terrain between Kengyel and Baghymajor (-farmstead), the middle zone of that. The under discussion early migration age ceramic originally — probably — was together with a more plentiful neolithic (e.g. Körös culture) find-material. About this on the other hand without a doubt I know, that I had gathered from the excavations of the years 1990—1991 of Baghy-homok (-sand) to southern direction. From negative side by all means it is worth mentioning, that on more places of the field carried out settlement-archeological researches did not come to light anywhere else that kind of finds, which are closely connected with my archeological relics. This rather high bank's part from the openings to some hundred metres lies, bordered by a depression and by a one-time water-flowing-bed. Unfortunately, that is a negative data also, that at the mentioned site in a number of occasions walked and gathered, I could not find anywhere adequate potsherds. However, it would be brought up the following, frequently experienced feature: the plough only in a given case bring to light more typical finds, consequently site (otherwise that remain hidden simply). In the ensemble, which will be taken to presentation in the following, the well-matched, can be glued potsherds are rather frequent, sometimes three also. Which fact would be refer to that, that these are derived from object(s) respectively from their upper layer of filling-in; in accordance with my observations this is no a rare matter. Than this more about the find-group, about its site we can not say. Perhabs the prospective researches will give an answer to it, and will come to light such finds, which would be verify the questions at issue. The approximately third-half part of the ceramic-material consists of typical 5th

—6th century Gepidic potsherds, wheel-turned, grey/brown, grainy pot-fragments. Them can be placed for the second half of the 5th century and the first half of the next. The other group of the relics can be divided two category. One of them is a fine substance ornamented ceramic, which are being reprezented by fragments of biconic vessels, mugs, cups, bowls, with decoration of smoothed-in zigzag and wavy lines. Their chalk-like surface — on that the decorating was discernable with difficult, on account of worn — is speciality (at least in the row of the ceramic from the late Roman age and early migration period, in Kengyel environs). Mainly the rim-forms are that, which pass for uniques in our countryside. The nearest analogies — in space, but perhabs in time too — are occurred on the 5th century (respectively of Hun age) Gepidic settlement in Byttonya (Szabó