Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 20. 1980 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1983)
Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Éry Kinga, K.: Comparative statistical studies on the physical anthropology of the Carpathian basin population between the 6–12th centuries A. D. p. 89–141.
Fig. 45: Distribution areas of the regional groups from the Period of the Hungarian conquest from the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers, other groups became available for study as well. Small samples representing the conquering population were numerous enough to form into regional groups for the purposes of comprehensive investigations (Éry 1978). 1. Regional characteristics A) On the basis of the material published to date four regional groups could be distinguished within the conquering population. The regional distribution of these groups within the Carpathian Basin is shown in Figure 45, while their parameters are listed in Table 9. Some areas, which provided abundant archaeological evidence of the conquering populations are not sufficiently known yet due to the lack of publications dealing with the bone material from the sites in question. Such an area is the Little Plain located north of the Danube river. No skeletal remains relevant to the Hungarian Conquest have been published from this territory (which is actually Southwestern Slovakia) The exception to this are the three Érsekújvár-Naszvad skulls (Nemeskéri 1941). Aside from these there is only a short reference concerning the Euro-mongoloid craniological material from 16 other sites (Vlcek 1954), which constitutes the total body of information on the physical characteristics of the conquerors from this region. Conquerors from the Middle Tisza river region and Transsylvania are similarly unknown. Consequently, tendencies outlined on the basis of the available skeletal data do not necessarily reflect all the important physical character of the conquering groups. Group A (No. 99; subcluster 2/a, Figure 46). This sample, representing the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers, was compiled using the bone material from 14 sites. The majority, 73 percent of this sample is Euro-mongoloid dominated by Turanoid type individuals( 9 ). The proportion of purely Europoid elements in this group is only 27 percent. Analogies: the 3rd century В. C. — 1st century A. D. "Usune" sample from Kazakhstan (No. 19), the Avar Period Homokmégy (No. 80), and the Árpád Period Beseôov (No. 104). Fig. 46: Dendrogram showing the analogies of group A (9) The sites concerned are as follows : Abony, Budapest -Soroksár, Harta-Béke TSz, Homokmégy-Halom, Ladánybene-Benepuszta, Mindszent-Koszorúsdűlő, NagykőrösFeketehalom, Nyáregyháza-Pótharaszti puszta, Szalkszentmárton-Paréjoshát, Szentes-Borbásföld, TiszaderzsKupasor, Tiszakécske-Okécske, Tömörkény-Piactér, ÜllőIlona út. 106
