Alba Regia. Annales Musei Stephani Regis. – Alba Regia. Az István Király Múzeum Évkönyve. 17. 1976 – Szent István Király Múzeum közleményei: C sorozat (1978)

Tanulmányok – Abhandlungen - Choyke, A. M.: A Classification of the Bone and Antler Tools from the Bronze Age Hill-fortress of Pákozdvár. p. 9–21.

C) Crude perforators drawn back and forth through material to be worked D) Crude perforators twisted through material to be worked III. Ornamental Antler Tine A) Bridle cheek bits B) Blanks for cheek bits C) Short cylindrical form D) Elongated cylindrical form with central groove IV. Large Rib and Long Bone Scrapers V. Fine perforators made from ossified material A) Perforator punched through material to be worked B) Perforator twisted through material to be worked C) Perforators drilled through material to be worked D) Needles VI. Flat rib ornaments VII. Tooth Burin VIII. Tooth ornaments IX. Mussel ornament The first step in understanding the technoeconomics of a particular tool class lies in the isolation of discreet and recognizable units with in that class. This formation of tool units has been attempted herein. Further clarification of the role of these bone tools in the life of Bronze age populations now depends on taking these types and placing them within the precise archaeological contexts of features found during the course of future excavations. Binghamton A. M.Choyke BIBLIOGRAPHY CLARK 1968 Marosi 1930 Petres-Bandi 1969 PIGOTT - CLARK 1965 S AUF AL vi 1969 SEMENOV 1964 THOMAS 1974 D. L. CLARK, Analytical Archaeology. London. A. MAROSI, A pákozdvári őstelep. AÉrt, XLIV, 53-73. Ë. F. PETRES —G. BANDI, Ásatás Lovasberény — Mihály vár on. AËrt, XCVI, 170 178. S. PIGGOTT —J. G. D. CLARK, Prehistoric Societies. New York. B. SÁRFALVI, Research Problems in Hungarian Applied Geography. Budapest. S. A. SEMENOV, Prehistoric Technologies. Bath. D. H. THOMAS, Predicting the Past. New York. 'Д