Levéltári Közlemények, 93. (2022)
Angol nyelvű összefoglalók
Abstracts Attila Szabó - Gábor Türke DIFFERENCES IN THE LEGAL BACKGROUND FOR ELECTRONIC DELIVERY PACKAGES The need for legal harmonization between Ministry of Human Resources (EMMI) Regulation No.34/2016 on the procedure and technical requirements for the receipt of documents stored in electronic form by public archives and Ministry of Interior (BM) Regulation No.3/2018 on the requirements for document management software to be used by public bodies arose based on the experience of the consultations launched in February 2021 to discuss the detailed requirements specification of the Integrated Legislative System (IJR), which is planned to be implemented within the framework of the Operational Programme for the Development of Public Administration and Public Services. The draft metadata of the IJR was built up from the metadata elements defined in Annex 1 of the BM Regulation. However, the IJR must be able to produce electronic delivery packets, so-called SIP packets, using the metadata set out in Annex 2 of the EMMI Regulation, based on the requirements specification. During the comparison, it became clear that the metadata set of the BM Regulation is missing twenty-four pieces of mandatory metadata defined in the EMMI Regulation. For a further seven metadata defined as mandatory in Annex 2 of the EMMI Regulation, the metadata fields of the BM Regulation need to be adapted and clarified in order to ensure that the content of the metadata of these Regulations is identical. Although the metadata of the EMMI Regulation have been prepared in accordance with international standards (EAD, ISADG), the optionalization of certain descriptive fields from mandatory to mandatory may be worth reconsidering in the event of a possible amendment of the Regulation. The metadata structures (Annexes 2-4) of the transfer packages are the result of compromises, not of the transposition of one or more mandatory international standards into Hungarian practice, but of the rules of the EAD 2002 version 2, which is still widely used in international archival practice. However, it maybe advisable to review the metadata structure of annexes in the event of a possible amendment of an EMMI regulation by reviewing the toolkit and rules of the newer EAD3 1.1.1 version published in 2019. A table describing and summarizing the metadata established by the BM and EMMI Regulation can be found in the article. 337
