Külpolitika - A Magyar Külügyi Intézet elméleti-politikai folyóirata - 1985 (12. évfolyam)

1985 / 1. szám - KÖNYVEKRŐL - Kolos Miklós: Timothy W.Stanley - Ronald I. Danielian - Samuel M. Rosenblatt: Az Egyesült Államok külgazdasági stratégiája a nyolcvanas évekre

Péter Hardi The Second Phase: The United States in the Light of Reagan’s Re-election The foreign policy choices of the United States like generally of great powers are de­termined by three areas of interests: i. strate­gic and security interests; 2. (national) eco­nomic interests; and (linking to the value system) ideological interests. These three sphe­res of interests do not still determine a unified foreign policy. One of the central assertions of this study is that the spheres of interests only partly coincide, rather result from each other; but partly they contradict each other. These controversies have strengthened since the taking of office by the Reagan ad­ministration. World power commitment, as one of the basic principles of the current American value system and perception, is in contradiction with a host of other interests and values guiding the American socio-poli­tical practice. World power role-playing, especially its Reaganian interpretation, namely the enhanced leaning on military power and interventi­onism, contradicts liberalism and democracy, moreover to the neoconservative ideology openly taken by the administration, in view of both international political norms and home policy. From the controversies indicated by the election results the conclusion is not that “Reaganism” has failed but that the ideologic­al buttressing of the Reagan activity is false. In other words: Reagan does not make steps which should have been dictated by the neo­conservative ideology used to justify his deeds. Today there is no comprehensive thought-sys­tem in the American political life which could be suitable for the appropriate interpretation of socio-economico-political practice. Miklós Losoncz Western Strategic Conceptions and Their Implementation in East-West Economic Relations The study reviews the changing and de­velopment of the strategic conceptions of the OECD member countries during the cold war period (1946—5 3), the period of transition (1933—63), liberalization (1965—72), détente (1972—75), and during the Carter (1976—80) and Reagan (1980—84) administrations. The western strategic conceptions focus on Ame­rican views and doctrines. The present study examines and analyses the initial suppositions of certain strategic conceptions that have be­come doctrines in the light of both the Soviet Union’s and the western world’s position, as well as their aims and the internal political and international barriers and the possibilities of their implementation or rather, their feasibil­ity. The study concludes that the aim of the western strategic conceptions showed a high degree of continuity, they were directed at weakening the Soviet Union’s power and in­ternational influence in the period after the Second World War. The linkage of economic and political issues and the promise of prefe­rential treatment in western economic re­lations in return for political concessions, helped to realize these aims. The various means and priorities of the linkage were often modified between the boundaries of the two extremes of total denial and conditioned co-operation. There is a close relation between the cost of individual strategies and their na­ture, as well as the prevailing American positions in the world economy and the pre­vailing state of the international power balan­ce. Total denial, so characteristic of the cold war era, turned into selective denial, conditioned cooperation with the weakening of American positions in the world economy and in the period of détente. This policy did not put so much pressure on the resources of the United States and its allies. The harder tone adopted by the Reagan administration was the consequence of the strenghtening of American-positions in the world economy their gaining ground in the electronics indus­try. This improvement, however, was not sufficient enough to win the support of the allies to help implement America’s strategy of confrontation. Following a close scrutiny of the internal political and international barriers of the implementation of the former strategic conceptions coupled with the knowledge as regards the truth contents of the suppositions, in the future one can expect the idea of indirect encircling to come once again into the fore­ground of western strategic conceptions, i. e. the process aimed at reducing or rather, subduing the Soviet Union’s possibilities in the'other parts of the world is likely to gather momentum. This would reduce direct con­frontation and high tension in East-West re­lations. It is easier to reconcile the idea of indirect encircling with the spirit of compe­tition prevalent in western societies than the strategy based on directly influencing East- West relations which entails the restricting of competition through administrative interven­tion (widespread export controls, etc.). Wes­tern countries expect this strategy will enable them to maintain their technological supe­riority as opposed to the CMEA countries. As a [result of the changing of western strategic thinking socialist countries have to face new kinds of challanges. V

Next

/
Oldalképek
Tartalom