Hidrológiai Közlöny, 2018 (98. évfolyam)
2018 / 4. szám - FÓRUM - Szabó Iván: Integration, a key to sustainable development in water utility services
58 Hidrológiai Közlöny 2018. 98. évf. 4. sz. [18] See, for example, Szilágyi. J. E. (2014). A magyar víziközmü szolgáltatók integrációjajogi nézőpontból. [Integration of Hungarian public water service providers from a legal point of view.] Pro Futoro 2014/1 pp. 144-148. [19] Act XXII of 2013 on the Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory (promulgated on 27 March 2013). [20] Chapter II of the Water Utility Services Act. [21 ] Section 42 of the Water Utility Services Act. [22] Sections 30 to 36 of the Implementing Decree. [23] According to the gazette-version of the Water Utility Services Act, the transitional measures provide that the service providers must have a user equivalent of50,000 when submitting their application, then they had to reach the number of 100,000 by 30 December 2014, then a user equivalent of 150,000 by 31 December 2016. According to the situation of October 2017, the service providers must have a user equivalent of 150,000. [24] According to Point 7 of Paragraph (1) of Section 2 of the Water Utility Services Act: user equivalent: an indicator that provides a uniform expression of the numer- osity of the users using the water utility services—per water utility service sectors, considering the capacity requirements of the users—according to the formula in Annex No. 1. The calculation method of the user equivalent is in Annex No. 1 of the Water Utility Services Act. [25] We speak of forced obligations if, in the absence of consensus, illegal damage or unjust enrichment, a contractual situation emerges at a command of law (e.g. obligation to contract in Section 206 of the Civil Code); however, the situation where somebody loses a claim otherwise accorded to him/her due to a command of law”. György Bíró (2004). [Kötelmi jog és szerződéstan közös szabályai.] Common rules of contract law and contract studies. University Coursebook. Novotni Foundation, p. 585. [26] For example: MEKH Decree No. 646/2015: Appointment of DAKÖV Dabas és Környéke Kft. operator of public interest for Pusztavacs [27[ Horváth M. and Péteri I. (2012). Nem folyik az többé vissza. Az Állam szerepének alakulása a víziközmü szolgáltatásban. [It does not flow back any more. The evolution of the role of the state in water utility services.] http://old.mtakti.hu/file/download/vesz2012/vi- zikozmu.pdf [28] Bevezetés a Közgazdaságtanba I. Mikroökonómiai alapfogalmak [Introduction to economics I. Basic terms of microeconomics] [29] For the details, see: J. E. Szilágyi (2014). A magyar víziközmü szolgáltatók integrációjajogi nézőpontból. [Integration of Hungarian public water service providers from a legal point of view.] Pro Futoro 2014/1 p. 162. [30] For the details, see: Hungarian Water Utility Association (MAVÍZ) http://www.maviz.org/system/files/kpmg-maviz_vi- zikozmu_agazati_helyzetkep_20150513.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2017) [31] J. E. Szilágyi (2014). A magyar víziközmű szolgáltatók integrációja jogi nézőpontból. [Integration of Hungarian public water service providers from a legal point of view.] Pro Futoro 2014/1 p. 162.
