Szabó János szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 24-25. 2007. (Budapest, 2007)
near last peristome. Between pairs of stronger spiral elements (cords), two threads visible, but only one in H. kutassyi. Remarks — The morphology of the shell and the ornament shows close relation to Hungariella kutassyi, however, there are also important differences (more carinae with spines on the ramp; strongly nodosed cords on the last whorl and the base). These differences might be enough to establish a new species. However, decision must be postponed because the specific variability 7 of Hungariella kutassyi, being unknown owing to the low specimen number, may cover also the morphology 7 of Hungariella aff. kutassyi. Distribution — The specimen was in the rescued material without label. The infilling of the shell and the preservation show that its locality is somewhere in the narrow distribution area of the chalky Dachstein Limestone facics in NW Budapest and the adjacent hills, most probably Remete-hegy or Fazekas-hegy; the age of the only Hungariella aff. kutassyi specimen must be regarded as Carnian—Norian. * * * Acknowledgements — The study of old and recendy collected Triassic gastropods from the Transdanubian Central Range is supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, project Ns: OTKA T 042739. References BARTKÓ, L. (1939): Fusus noricus nov. sp. a remetehegyi dachstein mészkőből. (Fusus noricus n. sp. aus dem Dachsteinkalkstein des Remetegebirges.) — Földtani Közlöny, 69: 196-198. BÉRCZINÉ MAKK, A. (1969): A fazekas-hegyi felsőtriász ammonoideák (Die obertriadischen ammonoiden des Fazekas-Berges). — Földtani Közlöny, 99: 351-367. ERDŐS J. (1946): Genera nova et species novae Calcioidarum (Hym.). (Figura 14 originales in textu.) —Annales historico-naturales Musei nationalis hungariä, 39: 131-165. HF.BF.RT, E. & DFSLOXGCHAIWS, E. (1860): Mémoire sur les fossiles de Monu'euil—Bellay (Maine-et-Loire). — Bulletin, Société linnéenne de 'Normandie, 5: 153-240, Pis 1-9. KUTASSY, A. (1927): Beiträge zur Stratigraphie und Paläontologie die Alpinen Triasschichten in der Umgebung von Budapest. — A magyar királyi Földtani Intézet Evkönyve, 27: 107—175, Pis 1—6. KUTASSY, A. (1933): Újabb adatok a Budapest környéki dachstemi mészkő faunájának ismeretéhez. (Weitere Beiträge zur Kentniss der Fauna des Dachsteinkalkes in der Umgebung von Budapest.) — Matematikai és Természettudományi Értesítő, 49: 222—250, Pis 1—2. KUTASSY, A. (1934): A nóri dachsteinmész faunája Szt. Annán Neumarkd közelében (Felső Krajna) [Die Fauna des norischen Dachsteinkalkes von St. Anna bei Neumarkd (Oberkrain)]. — Földtani Közlöny, 56(4—6): 65-81, Pis 2-4. KUTASSY, A. (1936): Fődolomit és Dachsteinmészkő faunák a Budai hegységből. (Faunen aus dem Hauptdolomit und Dachsteinkalk des Budaer Gebirges) — Matematikai és Természettudományi Értesítő, 54: 1006-1050, Pis 11-13. KUTASSY, A. (1940): Glossophora triadica II. — Fossilium Catalogus. F. Animalia., 81: 1- 477. Authors' address Dr. János SZABÓ Department of Geology and Palaeontology Hungarian Natural History Museum Budapest, VIII, Ludovika tér 2 Mail 1431 Budapest, pf. 137 Hungary E-mail: jszabo@nhmus.hu Explanations to Plate I 1-2 Hungariella pappi (KUTASSY, 1927) — x l; spire (1) and back (2) view of largest specimen (M 97.34.) to show weakly developed costae. 3 Hungariella pappi (KUTASSY, 1927) — x i ; spire view of specimen M 97.31. with sparse and strong costae. 4-5 Hungariella pappi (KUTASSY, 1927) — xl ; spire (4) and back (5) view of specimen 2007.5.1. with denser costae. 6-9 Hungariella pappi (KUTASSY, 1927) — xl ; neotype (M 2007.8.1.) in spire (6), back (7) and apertural (8) view; oblique apertural view (9) shows place of inner denticle. 10-11 Hungariella Stredae KUTASSY, 1933 — xl; back (10) and spire (11) view of 2007.7.1. specimen; nodes are arranged into costae only on juvenile shell. 12-13 Hungariella Stredae KUTASSY, 1933 — xl; lectotype (2007.4.1.) in back (12) and apertural (13) view; nodes elongated on last whorl and not arranged into costae. 14-15 Hungariella Stredae KUTASSY, 1933 — Xl; back (14) and spire (15) view of 2007.6.1. young specimen; nodes more globular and arranged into costae. 16-17 Hungariella Stredae KUTASSY, 1933 — xl; spire (16) and back (17) view of 97.34. specimen to demonstrate nodes are sometimes arranged into costae also in adults. 18-20 Hungariella kutassyi nom. nov. — xl; lectotype (2007.2.1.) in aperture (18), back (19) and spire (20) view. 21-22 Hungariella aff. kutassyi — xl; the 2007.3.1. specimen m back (21) and spire view (22).