Szabó János szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 24-25. 2007. (Budapest, 2007)

molars (2005.52., 53., 83., 84.). The lingual quersporn II is independent and conelet-like in most specimens, however, it is ridge-like and connected to the anterolophulus in a single molar (N° 2005.86.). The mesoloph is generally not developed, but it is incipient in one of the molars (2005.83.). Protoconus-sporn and lingual cingulum are found in all M

1 molars. The posterior ectoloph of the paraconus is connected to the anterior ectoloph of the metaconus in 7 molars. There is a narrow fissure between the ectolophs only in the 2005. 51. molar. A complete ectoloph (labial anteroconus-paraconus-metaconus connection) developed in 3 molars (2005.51., 53., 83.). In the juvenile, unworn molars, the lophs are slightly lower than the cusps. •i 1 1 1 1 1— > 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 XW Figure 1 — A comparision of the mean L and mean W values (mm) of M

2 molars of Cricetodon klariankae n. sp. (C k) and some cricetodontid populations from Turkey and Greece. The data are after RUMMEL 1998 and DE BRUIJN 1976. — 1: Cricetodon pasalarensis, Mürefte; 2: Cricetodon pasalarensis, Pasalar; 3: Cricetodon pasalarensis, Pasalar, sand; 4: Cricetodon candirensis, Çandir; 5: Cricetodon candirensis, Çandir, new collection; 6: By%autinia cariensis, Kocga2Í; 7: By%antinia cariensis, Sariçay 1.; 8: By^antinia eskihisarensis, Yeni Eskihisar; 9: By%antinia bayraktepensis, Yeni Eskihisar; 10: By^antinia bayraktepensis, Mahmutköy; 11: Bj^antinia bayraktepensis, Pismanköy; 12: Byzçintinia o^ansoyi, Bagici; 13: By%antinia pikemiiensis, Pikermi; 14: Byzçintinia pikemiiensis, Karaözü. Figure 2 — A comparision of the mean L and mean W values (mm) of M

2 molars of Cricetodon klariankae n. sp. (Ck) and some cricetodontid populations from Central Europe and France. The data are after BOLLIGER (1994), BRUIJN DE et al. (1993), DAXNER-HÖCK (2003), RUMMEL (1995, 1997, 2000), RUMMEL & KÁLIN (2003). — 1: Cricetodon hungaricus, Hasznos; 2: Cricetodon bolligeri, Petersbuch 10; 3: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Petersbuch 39; 4: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Petersbuch 32; 5: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Rüxnikon; 6: Cricetodon sansaniensis, Zeglingen; 7: Cricetodon jumaensis, Schmidrüti; 8: Cricetodon engesseri, Schauenberg-Langriet 690 m; 9: Cricetodon meini, Mühlbach; 10: Cricetodon äff. meini, Sagentobel; 11: Cricetodon äff. meini, Gallenbach 2b; 12: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Laimering 2; 13: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Laimering 3; 14: Cricetodon äff. aureus, Steinberg; 15: Cricetodon sansaniensis, Sansan; 16: Cricetodon albanensis, La Grive; 17: Mixocricetodon dehmi, Petersbuch 31; 39. M

2 molars (Table 2) — The M

2 molars have four roots. The anteroconus is two parted, but not divided as in the M

1 molars. The lingual part of the anteroconus is connected to a lingual anterocingulum. The lingual anteroconus and the proto-conus are connected by a short anterolophulus. The labial anteroconus-sporn is connected to the anterior ectoloph of the paraconus in four molars (J\f° 2005. 86., 54., 60., 63.). This connection is not developed in 6 molars (Ne 2005.85., 58., 59., 61., 62., 184.). The protoconus sporn is consistandy developded. The mesoloph is missing in all molars. The posterior ectoloph of the paraconus is connected to the anterior ectoloph of the metaconus in all molars. Complete ectoloph is developed in three molars (2005.60., 54., 53.). In the juvenile, unworn molars the lophs are slightly lower developed than the cusps. Table 2 — Measurements of M

z molars. Inventory N° L (mm) W (mm) Figures 2005.54. 3.05 2.r 2005.58. 2.80 2.0 Plate I: 4 2005.59. 2.75 2.05 Plate II: 1, 5, 9 2005.60. 2.65 2.05 2005.61. 2.77 2.05 2005.62. 2.80 l.8~ 2005 63. 2.92 2.05 2005.85. 2.77 2.15 2005.86. 2.77 2.07 2005.184. 2.72 1.85 2005.478. 2.82 2.05 average 2.S(i 2.03