O. Merkl szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 66. (Budapest, 2005)

DA, 1988,//. angustipennis MONSERRAT, 1982,//. cornuta MONSERRAT, 1982,//. editae SZIRÁKI, 2002, H. electrina LlU, YANG ET SHEN, 2004, H.fusca MEINANDER, 1972, H. hainanica LlU, YANG et SHEN, 2004, H. helenae SZIRÁKI, 2001, H. interrupta (BANKS, 1937), H. monserrati SZIRÁKI, 2001, H. nigripalpis MEINANDER, 1972, H. pepa MONSERRAT, 1982, H. picticomis (BANKS, 1939), H. sakaeratica SZIRÁKI, 2002, H. tanzaniae MEINANDER, 1998, H. terminális (BANKS, 1913), H. tricomis LlU, YANG et SHEN, 2004, H. unicornis LlU, YANG et SHEN, 2004, H. vietnamensis MEINANDER, 1990. - Distinctive features: basal cross-vein Rs-M is placed between the two thickenings of M; wings mostly unspotted. - Distribution: South-East Asia and Afrotropical Region. Nimboa NAVAS, 1925 Seventeen species of the genus can be divided into two species groups on the basis of some features of male genitalia. Two other species are insufficiently known, so cannot be included in these groups. Nimboa basipunctata group - Species included: N. albizzae KlMMINS, 1952, N. basipunctata WlTHYCOMBE, 1925, N. bifurcata MEINANDER, 1998, N. capensis TJEDER, 1957, N. manselli MEINANDER, 1998, N. natalensis TJEDER, 1957,/V. pallida SZIRÁKI et GREVE, 1996, N. pauliani KlMMINS, 1960. - Distinctive features: stylus unforked, or with a stout basal side branch. - Distribution: Seven species are known from the Afrotropical Region and one from India. - Remarks: N. natalensis was regarded as a junior synonym of N. capensis by MEINANDER (1998). However, the structure of stylus is different in the two species (Figs 12-13). Consequently, in my opinion, N. natalensis is a valid species. Nimboa macroptera group - Species included: N. adelae MONSERRAT, 1985, N. asadeva RAUSCH et ASPÖCK, 1978, N. espanoli OHM, 1973, N. kasyi RAUSCH et ASPÖCK, 1978, N. macroptera ASPÖCK et ASPÖCK, 1965, N. marroquina MONSERRAT, 1985, /V. ressli ASPÖCK et A SPÖCK, 1965, N. sumarana SZIRÁKI, 1997, N. yemenica MONSERRAT, 1996. - Distinctive features: stylus without basal side branch, however it is forked; it has a slender median or subapical side branch. Distribution: South Palaearctic. Coniopteryx CURTIS, 1834 This is a large genus distributed worldwide, with six subgenera. Two of them (Coniopteryx s. str. and Xeroconiopteryx MEINANDER, 1972) are divided into spe-