S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 64. (Budapest, 2003)
ParochthiphilalucidifronsTanasijtshuk, 1976- 1 male: Dömsöd, Apajpuszta, szikes víz széle, 1980.VL5; 2 females: Kiskunsági NP, Fülöpháza, Szívósszék, 1979. VI. 6. - I found now these three specimens among the Parochthiphila material in the HNHM. Formerly known from Mongolia and the Far East of Russia; new to Hungary. Parochthiphila transversa Hennig, 1938 - 1 female: Romania, Transylvania, Gyergyói-hav., Pongrác-tetö, 1995.VII.4-5, leg. Podlussány A. - A very rare species known from Romania and Macedonia only. By publication of this specimen I would stress only that also this species is one among those, which are still expected to occur in Hungary. Neoleucopis orbiseta (McAlpine, 1971) - 8 males: Budapest, Pestszentlőrinc, Péterhalmi-erdő, tölgyes széle (virágokról is), 2001. júl. 15. - A species new to Hungary, formerly known from Finland (McAlpine 1971) and Great Britain. Actually the occurrence of other two species of this genus, N. atratula (Ratzeburg, 1844) and N. tapiae (Blanchard, 1964) seemed more probable, and indeed, they were listed as species expected to occur in Hungary in the Checklist (of course, the identification above was based on study of the male genitalia). Lipoleucopis praecox de Meijere, 1928 - 1 female: Budapest, Pestszentlőrinc, Péterhalmi-erdő, tölgyes, 2002.03.15. - The genus and species are new for the Hungarian fauna; its occurrence in our country was expected long ago (Papp 1979). Chamaemyia Meigen, 1803 Chamaemyia aestiva Tanasijtshuk, 1970 -1 published it from Hungary (Papp 1979) but those data seem more reliable, which Tanasijtchuk & Beschovski (1991) and Beschovski (1995) published from several Hungarian localities. Chamaemyia aridella (Fallén, 1823) - Following Tanasijtshuk' s earlier works, I put it into synonymy to Ch. juncorum, incorrectly. Its first reliable record from Hungary was published by Tanasijtchuk & Beschovski (1991: 20). Dr V. Beschovski captured it from several Hungarian localities. Newly collected material: 4 males: Őrségi NP: Szakonyfalu, Szakonyfalui-patak melletti láprét, 2002. júl. 15; 6 males, 1 female: Csévharaszt, fátyolvirágról/homokbuckás, útszéli virágokról, 2002. 06.15./25; 3 males, 1 female: Budapest, Pestszentlőrinc, Péterhalmi-erdő, tölgyes, 2002.05.25-26./ 06. 8-9. Chamaemyia bicolor Beschovski, 1994 - 1 male: Csévharaszt TT, útszéli virágokról, 2002. 06.15; 1 male: Kelebia, halastó, 1957.VII.12, leg. Erdős - Ch. flavipalpis (Halid.), det. L. Papp; 1 male: Bpest, Kertész, 1896. VI.5, "flavicornis Str." det. Soós - Ch. flavipalpis (Halid.), det. L. Papp; 1 male, 1 female: KNP: Bugac, nagyerdő, 1980.1X. 16./17; 1 male: Harkány, 1963.V.25, Dr Wéber; 1 female: Örkény, Ilonamajor, homokbuckás, 1997.VII.4, 21-23 óra; 3 females: "flavicornis Str." det. Soós - Ch. flavipalpis (Halid.), det. L. Papp: Vrdnik, Pável; Zamárdi, rét, parti sasos, 1953.VIII.25, leg. Mihályi; Agasegyháza, homokbuckás, 1957.V.21-24, leg. Mihályi & Zsirkó. - A species new to Hungary. Chamaemyia elegáns Panzer, 1806 - Specimens revised in the HNHM: Ukraina: 3 males, 4 females: Körösmező [Jasinya], Kertész, 1911 .VI. 22; Hungary: 1 female: Kalocsa, coll. Thalhammer. Chamaemyia emiliae Tanasijtshuk, 1970 -1 am sorry, I cannot reconstruct my concept on this species in 1979. Three males with labels: Alacsony Tátra, etc., one of which had been labelled "Chamaemyia emiliae" by V. L. Tanasijtshuk, are identified now as C7/. submontana Beschovski. Some other specimens belong to Ch. aestiva. No specimen of Ch. emiliae was found during my present study. Fortunately Dr V. Beschovski captured one male at Darány (22.06.1982), which he published (Beschovski 1995: 37).
