S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 63. (Budapest, 2002)

Dohrniphora Dahl, 1898 Dohrniphora cornu ta (Bigot, 1856) - 1 maie: Csopak, Balaton-part, 1975. IX. 22, leg. Tóth S.; 1 male: Szarvas, sertésistálló, 1972. VIII. 11, leg. Papp L.; 1 male: Budapest, Pestszentlöric, Péterhalmi-erdő, tölgyes, 2000. aug. 20. - Schmitz (1953: 204) recorded it as new to Hungary (as Diplonevra) from Szeged and "Hungária media" (Hungary was not listed in the Palaearctic Catalogue (Disney 1991) for this species). Gymnophora Macquart, 1835 There are nearly 1000 specimens selected as Gymnophora spp. in the HNHM. Schmitz (1928) recorded four species as "U" from Hungary. All the four were found again, although only a minor part of the above specimens were identified now. We cannot exclude that some other species (e.g. G. healeyae Disney, 1980) may also occur in our country. Gymnophora arcuata (Meigen, 1830) -9 males, 6 females: Budapest, Pestszentlőrinc, Péterhalmi-erdő, tölgyes, 2001. 05. 13, 08. 05./12./25-26, 10.07

./9-10./13-14; 1 male: Duna-Ipoly NP: Diósjenő, Kemence-p. felső folyása fölött és mellett; 1 female: Szatmár-Beregi TK: Kisar, Tisza ártere, 2001. 07. 12. Other 26 males and 46 females from the KNP: Fülöpháza, Kunfehértó, Ócsa, Duna-Ipoly NP: Szokolya (Les-v.), Diósjenő (Kemence-p.), K-Mecsek TK: Óbánya (Óbányai-v.), Zempléni TK: Nagyhuta (Rostalló), Bakony-hg.: Ajka, Bükk-hg., Budapest (Pestszentlőrinc), Síkfőkút, Csévharaszt, Dencsháza, Dunafalva, Verőce (Magyarkút). We (Ádám & Papp 2001) regarded Thalhammer's (1900: 36) record as highly questionable. Schmitz (1928: 142) must have seen several specimens from Hungary, but none of them has been found again since 1956. Gymnophora integrális Schmitz, 1920-1 male: Budai-hg., Rózsika-forrás, 1981. IV. 10, leg. Draskovits and Vály; 2 males, 1 female: Verőce, Magyarkút, Keskenybükki-p. v., patakpart, 1997. IV. 27; 1 male, 1 female: Pécs, Égervölgy, 1979. V. 11, leg. Majer; 2 females: Duna-Ipoly NP: Szokolya, Les-völgy, patak fökött, mellett, 2000.10.23. - The specimens were identified based on genitalia (abdomen) preparations. Schmitz'

s (1928: 142) record seems valid, of course, but also that/ those specimen(s) was/were lost. However, he (Schmitz 1953:206) recorded it again as new for Hungary from Tihany. Gymnophora nigripennis Schmitz, 1926 - 1 female: Bakony, Ajka, ligeterdő, 1964. VI. 23, leg Tóth S.; 1 male, 3 females: Zempléni TK: Regéc, Ördög-völgy, patak fölött és mellett, 1999. június 8./28, leg. Papp L., Szappanos AVPapp L., Bajza Zs.; 2 females: ibid., Nagyhuta, Rostalló, Kemence-patak, égeres, 2000. július 5. Gymnophora quartomollis Schmitz, 1920 - 4 males, 3 females: Budapest, Pestszentlőrinc, Péterhalmi-erdő, 2001. május 13, 05. 19-20; 1 male: Duna-Ipoly NP: Diósjenő, Kemence-p. felső folyása fölött és mellett; 2 males, 1 female: Csévharaszt, nyíres, 2001. 05. 23; 1 male: Zempléni TK: Regéc, Ördög-v., Malaise-cs., patak fölött, 2001. július 10-11., leg. Papp L. és Papp János. Other 18 males and 39 females in the HNHM from the Bükk-hg., Síkfőkút, Börzsöny-hg.: Szokolya, KNP: Dabas, Ócsa, Mecsek-hg.: Orfű, Dencsháza, Karakószörcsök, Zalaszántó. - There was no specimen in the HNHM after 1956 (the first record from Schmitz 1928: 142), but Brown (1987: 293) studied a male also from Budapest in the collection of the Bonn Museum.